Literature DB >> 17319854

Factors determining esthetic outcome after breast cancer conservative treatment.

Maria J Cardoso1, Jaime Cardoso, Ana C Santos, Conny Vrieling, David Christie, Göran Liljegren, Isabel Azevedo, Jørgen Johansen, José Rosa, Natália Amaral, Rauni Saaristo, Virgilio Sacchini, Henrique Barros, Manuel C Oliveira.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors that determine esthetic outcome after breast cancer conservative treatment, based on a consensual classification obtained with an international consensus panel. Photographs were taken from 120 women submitted to conservative unilateral breast cancer surgery (with or without axillary surgery) and radiotherapy. The images were sent to a panel of observers from 13 different countries and consensus on the classification of esthetic result (recorded as excellent, good, fair or poor) was obtained in 113 cases by means of a Delphi method. For each patient, data were collected retrospectively regarding patient characteristics, tumor, and treatment factors. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to evaluate the correlation between these factors and overall cosmetic results. On univariate analysis, younger and thinner patients as well as patients with lower body mass index (BMI) and premenopausal status obtained better cosmetic results. In the group of tumor- and treatment-related factors, larger removed specimens, clearly visible scars, the use of chemotherapy and longer follow-up period were associated with less satisfactory results. On multivariate analysis, only BMI and scar visibility maintained a significant association with cosmesis. BMI and scar visibility are the only factors significantly associated with cosmetic results of breast cancer conservative treatment, as evaluated by an international consensus panel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17319854     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00394.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  13 in total

1.  Can nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with modified extended latissimus dorsi muscular flap improve the cosmetic and functional outcome of patients with breast cancer?

Authors:  Florian Fitzal
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Cosmetic outcome 1-5 years after breast conservative surgery, irradiation and systemic therapy.

Authors:  Gyöngyi Kelemen; Zoltán Varga; György Lázár; László Thurzó; Zsuzsanna Kahán
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Prone whole-breast irradiation using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in women undergoing breast conservation for early disease yields high rates of excellent to good cosmetic outcomes in patients with large and/or pendulous breasts.

Authors:  Carmen Bergom; Tracy Kelly; Natalya Morrow; J Frank Wilson; Alonzo Walker; Qun Xiang; Kwang Woo Ahn; Julia White
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Single dose IOERT versus whole breast irradiation : Cosmetic results in breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  Henk Struikmans; Malou Snijders; Mirjam E Mast; Ursula Fisscher; Jan-Huib Franssen; Marcelle J Immink; Andreas Marinelli; Jos Merkus; Anna Petoukhova; Gabrielle Speijer; Peter Koper
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Cosmetic Consequences of Breast-Conserving Treatment for Breast Cancer: Something Worth Talking About.

Authors:  Angelique Brands-Appeldoorn; Sabrina Maaskant-Braat; Karin Schenk; Rudi Roumen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-09-26

6.  Systematization of Oncoplastic Surgery: Selection of Surgical Techniques and Patient-Reported Outcome in a Cohort of 1,035 Patients.

Authors:  Mahdi Rezai; Sarah Knispel; Stephanie Kellersmann; Hildegard Lax; Rainer Kimmig; Peter Kern
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Dermoglandular rotation flaps for breast-conserving therapy: aesthetic results, patient satisfaction, and morbidity in comparison to standard segmentectomy.

Authors:  Ursula Hille-Betz; Bernhard Vaske; Helga Henseler; Philipp Soergel; Sudip Kundu; Lars Makowski; Sophia Schelcher; Sebastian Wojcinski; Peter Hillemanns
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-11-04

8.  Delphi Consensus Recommendations: Intraoperative Technique and Postoperative Management of Patients with Natrelle 410 Implants.

Authors:  G Patrick Maxwell; Mitchell H Brown; Per Hedén; Jie Luan; Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Mollie Carter
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-12-09

9.  Prone versus supine position for adjuvant breast radiotherapy: a prospective study in patients with pendulous breasts.

Authors:  Marco Krengli; Laura Masini; Tina Caltavuturo; Carla Pisani; Giuseppina Apicella; Eleonora Negri; Letizia Deantonio; Marco Brambilla; Giuseppina Gambaro
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Prospective study of postoperative whole breast radiotherapy for Japanese large-breasted women: a clinical and dosimetric comparisons between supine and prone positions and a dose measurement using a breast phantom.

Authors:  Kana Takahashi; Madoka Morota; Yoshikazu Kagami; Hiroyuki Okamoto; Shuhei Sekii; Koji Inaba; Naoya Murakami; Hiroshi Igaki; Yoshinori Ito; Takashi Uno; Jun Itami
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.