Literature DB >> 17319753

Mesiodistal root angulation using panoramic and cone beam CT.

James L Peck1, Glenn T Sameshima, Arthur Miller, Peter Worth, D C Hatcher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the panoramic projection can accurately determine mesiodistal root angulations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A plaster study model of the dentition of each of five patients was prepared. A radiographic stent containing radiopaque markers was fabricated for each of the models. Panoramic and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken on each patient with the radiographic stent seated on the dentition. Root angulations for each of the radiographic images were measured and compared.
RESULTS: Root angulation was measured by three independent individuals and good reliability between measurements was demonstrated. Compared to plaster model measurements (the gold standard), the CBCT scan produced very accurate measurements of root angulation. Compared to CBCT images, panoramic projections did not provide reliable data on root angulation.
CONCLUSION: Panoramic images did not accurately represent the mesiodistal root angulations on clinical patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17319753     DOI: 10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0206:MRAUPA]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  20 in total

1.  Incidence of three roots and/or four root canals in the permanent mandibular first molars in a Korean sub-population.

Authors:  Ju-Kyong Jang; Ove A Peters; Woocheol Lee; Sung-Ae Son; Jeong-Kil Park; Hyeon-Cheol Kim
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A preliminary study for determination of three-dimensional root apex position of the maxillary teeth using camera calibration technology.

Authors:  Hyun Jun Oh; Il-Hyung Yang; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 3.  CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use.

Authors:  S D Kapila; J M Nervina
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 4.  Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics.

Authors:  İpek Coşkun; Burçak Kaya
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2018-06

5.  [Comparison of mesiodistal tooth angulations determined through traditional panoramic radiographs and cone beam CT panoramic images].

Authors:  Qiaoling Lei; Li Zhou; Lei Lei; Yanmin Wang
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2014-08

6.  Evaluation of crown inclination and angulation after orthodontic treatment using digital models : Comparison to the prescription of the brackets used.

Authors:  Iury Oliveira Castro; Bruno Frazão Gribel; Ana Helena Gonçalves de Alencar; José Valladares-Neto; Carlos Estrela
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with posttreatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Daniel G Bouwens; Lucia Cevidanes; John B Ludlow; Ceib Phillips
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Incidental findings arising with cone beam computed tomography imaging of the orthodontic patient.

Authors:  Sheelagh A Rogers; Nicholas Drage; Peter Durning
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  The suitability of panoramic radiographs for clinical decision making regarding root angulation compared to cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Athbi Alqareer; Rania Nada; Aref Ghayyath; Mariam Baghdady; Veerasathpurush Allareddy
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Comparison of linear and angular changes assessed in digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Camila Massaro; Carolina Losada; Lucia Cevidanes; Marilia Yatabe; Daniela Garib; José Roberto Pereira Lauris; Marcos Ioshida; Diego Rey; Maria Antonia Alvarez; Erika Benavides; Hector Rios; Juan Fernando Aristizabal; Antonio Carlos Ruellas
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.