Literature DB >> 17318662

Costs and quality of life for patients with multiple sclerosis in Belgium.

Gisela Kobelt1.   

Abstract

This cost-of-illness analysis for Belgium is part of a Europe-wide study on the costs of multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective was to analyze the costs and quality of life (QOL) related to the level of disease severity. Patients from four specialized MS centres participated in the survey by answering a mail questionnaire. In addition to details on the disease (type of disease, relapses, level of functional disability), the questionnaire asked for information on all medical and non-medical resource consumption, sick leave, early retirement, informal care as well as QOL (in the form of utility weights). A total of 799 respondents were included in the analysis (response rate 38%). The mean age of the cohort was 48 years, and 12% of patients were 65 years or older. Forty-six percent of patients had mild disease (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score 0-3), 20% severe disease (EDSS score > or =7), and the mean EDSS score in the sample was 4.2 (median 4.0), with a utility of 0.51. Costs and utility are highly correlated with disease severity. Workforce participation decreases from approximately 75 to 80% in early disease to approximately 6% in the very late stages. Hospitalization and ambulatory visits increase by a factor of 10 between early and late disease; investments and services increase from basically no cost to euro 6.000 to euro 7.000 per year; productivity losses increase ninefold; and informal care increases from euro 300 per year at an EDSS score of 0-1 to euro 15.000 to euro 16.000 per year at an EDSS score > or =7. Hence, total mean costs per patient are driven essentially by the distribution of the severity levels in the sample, increasing from approximately euro 12.000 per year at an EDSS score of 0-1 to euro 51.500 per year at an EDSS score of 8-9. The same is true for utility, which decreases from 0.85 to 0.06 as the disease becomes severe. However, the utility loss compared to the general population is high at all levels of the disease (0.25 at an EDSS score of 2 to 0.44 at an EDSS score 5-6 leading to an estimated loss of 0.3 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) per patient. Relapses for patients with an EDSS score < 5 are associated with a cost of approximately euro 3.360 and a utility loss of 0.1 during the quarter in which they occur. Public payers (health-care costs, community care, sick payments and invalidity pensions) cover an estimated 55% of all costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17318662     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-006-0377-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  18 in total

1.  Multiple sclerosis: relapses, resource use, and costs.

Authors:  A J Hawton; C Green
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-10-05

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jessica Sharac; Paul McCrone; Ramon Sabes-Figuera
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  TSPO PET with [18F]GE-180 sensitively detects focal neuroinflammation in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Marcus Unterrainer; C Mahler; L Vomacka; S Lindner; J Havla; M Brendel; G Böning; B Ertl-Wagner; T Kümpfel; V M Milenkovic; R Rupprecht; M Kerschensteiner; P Bartenstein; Nathalie L Albert
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Economic burden of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Huseyin Naci; Rachael Fleurence; Julie Birt; Amy Duhig
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  The direct cost of patients with multiple sclerosis: a survey from Italian MS centres.

Authors:  Berto P; Amato M P; Bellantonio P; Bortolon F; Cavalla P; Florio C; Lugaresi A; Montanari E; Rottoli M; Simone I L; Zaffaroni M
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Menarche, oral contraceptives, pregnancy and progression of disability in relapsing onset and progressive onset multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M B D'hooghe; P Haentjens; G Nagels; T D'Hooghe; J De Keyser
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Chronical illness and maternity: life conditions, quality of life and coping in women with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Sabine Twork; Markus Wirtz; Sabine Schipper; Jörg Klewer; Antje Bergmann; Joachim Kugler
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Future MS care: a consensus statement of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group.

Authors:  Peter Rieckmann; Alexey Boyko; Diego Centonze; Alasdair Coles; Irina Elovaara; Eva Havrdová; Otto Hommes; Jacques Lelorier; Sarah A Morrow; Celia Oreja-Guevara; Nick Rijke; Sven Schippling
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Assessing cost-effectiveness in the management of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Ceri J Phillips; Ioan Humphreys
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2009-11-18

10.  Differences in utility scores obtained through Brazilian and UK value sets: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Maíra Libertad Soligo Takemoto; Nilceia Lopes da Silva; Ana Carolina Padula Ribeiro-Pereira; Arthur Orlando Correa Schilithz; Cibele Suzuki
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.