Myeong Soo Lee1, Max H Pittler2, Edzard Ernst2. 1. Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter & Plymouth, 25 Victoria Park Road, Exeter, EX2 4NT, UK. myeong.lee@pms.ac.uk. 2. Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter & Plymouth, 25 Victoria Park Road, Exeter, EX2 4NT, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tai chi is a form of complementary and alternative medicine with similarities to aerobic exercises, which has been recommended for relieving cancer-related symptoms. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and critically evaluate the evidence available from controlled clinical trials of tai chi as a supportive therapy for cancer patients. METHODS: We have searched the literature using 19 databases from their respective inceptions through October 2006, without language restrictions. Methodological quality was assessed using Jadad score. RESULTS: The searches identified 27 potentially relevant studies. Three randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and one non-randomised controlled trial (CCT) met our inclusion criteria. All of these trials assessed patients with breast cancer. Two RCTs reported significant differences in psychological and physiological symptoms compared to psychosocial support control. Most trials suffered from methodological flaws such as small sample size, inadequate study design and poor reporting. CONCLUSION: The evidence is not convincing enough to suggest that tai chi is an effective supportive treatment for cancer. Further research should attempt to answer the many open questions related to the usefulness of tai chi for supportive cancer care.
BACKGROUND: Tai chi is a form of complementary and alternative medicine with similarities to aerobic exercises, which has been recommended for relieving cancer-related symptoms. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and critically evaluate the evidence available from controlled clinical trials of tai chi as a supportive therapy for cancer patients. METHODS: We have searched the literature using 19 databases from their respective inceptions through October 2006, without language restrictions. Methodological quality was assessed using Jadad score. RESULTS: The searches identified 27 potentially relevant studies. Three randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and one non-randomised controlled trial (CCT) met our inclusion criteria. All of these trials assessed patients with breast cancer. Two RCTs reported significant differences in psychological and physiological symptoms compared to psychosocial support control. Most trials suffered from methodological flaws such as small sample size, inadequate study design and poor reporting. CONCLUSION: The evidence is not convincing enough to suggest that tai chi is an effective supportive treatment for cancer. Further research should attempt to answer the many open questions related to the usefulness of tai chi for supportive cancer care.
Authors: Karen M Mustian; Jeffrey A Katula; Diane L Gill; Joseph A Roscoe; David Lang; Karen Murphy Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2004-09-30 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Patrick Mansky; Tim Sannes; Dawn Wallerstedt; Adeline Ge; Mary Ryan; Laura Lee Johnson; Margaret Chesney; Lynn Gerber Journal: Integr Cancer Ther Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 3.279
Authors: Xiaosha Ni; Raymond Javan Chan; Patsy Yates; Wenyi Hu; Xianhong Huang; Yan Lou Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Peter M Wayne; Julie E Buring; Roger B Davis; Ellen M Connors; Paolo Bonato; Benjamin Patritti; Mary Fischer; Gloria Y Yeh; Calvin J Cohen; Danette Carroll; Douglas P Kiel Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Michelle C Janelsins; Karen M Mustian; Luke J Peppone; Lisa K Sprod; Michelle Shayne; Supriya Mohile; Kavita Chandwani; Jennifer S Gewandter; Gary R Morrow Journal: J Cancer Sci Ther Date: 2011-09-29