PURPOSE: To evaluate a fully automatic computer-assisted diagnostic system for mild dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), permitting distinction from mild Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), glucose metabolic images were obtained from mild DLB and mild AD patients. Two groups consisting of 16 mild DLB patients and 21 mild AD patients were recruited for diagnostic evaluation between mild DLB and mild AD. The mean age+/-SD of the mild DLB group and the mild AD group was 74.3+/-4.9 and 71.7+/-2.1 years, respectively, and the mean scores of the MMSE for the mild DLB and the mild AD group were 21.7+/-1.9 and 23.1+/-2.1, respectively. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic performance, in terms of discrimination between DLB and AD, of conventional axial FDG-PET images inspected visually by experts and beginners with that of our fully automatic diagnosis system using the statistical brain mapping method and Z scores obtained with the DLB template. RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of the automatic system was comparable to that of visual inspection by experts. The area under the ROC curve for the automatic diagnosis system was 0.77. The mean area under the ROC curve for visual inspection by experts and beginners was 0.76 and 0.65, respectively. CONCLUSION: The fully automatic differential diagnosis system for distinction between mild DLB and AD showed a similar diagnostic accuracy to visual inspection by experts. It would be a useful diagnostic tool to distinguish mild DLB from mild AD in clinical practice.
PURPOSE: To evaluate a fully automatic computer-assisted diagnostic system for mild dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), permitting distinction from mild Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), glucose metabolic images were obtained from mild DLB and mild ADpatients. Two groups consisting of 16 mild DLB patients and 21 mild ADpatients were recruited for diagnostic evaluation between mild DLB and mild AD. The mean age+/-SD of the mild DLB group and the mild AD group was 74.3+/-4.9 and 71.7+/-2.1 years, respectively, and the mean scores of the MMSE for the mild DLB and the mild AD group were 21.7+/-1.9 and 23.1+/-2.1, respectively. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic performance, in terms of discrimination between DLB and AD, of conventional axial FDG-PET images inspected visually by experts and beginners with that of our fully automatic diagnosis system using the statistical brain mapping method and Z scores obtained with the DLB template. RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of the automatic system was comparable to that of visual inspection by experts. The area under the ROC curve for the automatic diagnosis system was 0.77. The mean area under the ROC curve for visual inspection by experts and beginners was 0.76 and 0.65, respectively. CONCLUSION: The fully automatic differential diagnosis system for distinction between mild DLB and AD showed a similar diagnostic accuracy to visual inspection by experts. It would be a useful diagnostic tool to distinguish mild DLB from mild AD in clinical practice.
Authors: K Lobotesis; J D Fenwick; A Phipps; A Ryman; A Swann; C Ballard; I G McKeith; J T O'Brien Journal: Neurology Date: 2001-03-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: L Hansen; D Salmon; D Galasko; E Masliah; R Katzman; R DeTeresa; L Thal; M M Pay; R Hofstetter; M Klauber Journal: Neurology Date: 1990-01 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: K Ishii; F Willoch; S Minoshima; A Drzezga; E P Ficaro; D J Cross; D E Kuhl; M Schwaiger Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: R Takahashi; K Ishii; N Miyamoto; T Yoshikawa; K Shimada; S Ohkawa; T Kakigi; K Yokoyama Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Axel Van Der Gucht; Laurent Cleret de Langavant; Ophélie Bélissant; Corentin Rabu; Anne-Ségolène Cottereau; Eva Evangelista; Julia Chalaye; Sophie Bonnot-Lours; Gilles Fénelon; Emmanuel Itti Journal: Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-01-29
Authors: Sasan Partovi; Roger Yuh; Sara Pirozzi; Ziang Lu; Spencer Couturier; Ulrich Grosse; Mark D Schluchter; Aaron Nelson; Robert Jones; James K O'Donnell; Peter Faulhaber Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-01-15
Authors: Robert Perneczky; Janine Diehl-Schmid; Hans Förstl; Alexander Drzezga; Florian May; Alexander Kurz Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-10-30 Impact factor: 9.236