Literature DB >> 17317957

X chromosome loss and ageing.

L M Russell1, P Strike, C E Browne, P A Jacobs.   

Abstract

The detection of a low level 45,X cell line during routine cytogenetic analysis in an adult female can be difficult to interpret. In the absence of recent information regarding loss of the X chromosome and ageing, we undertook a prospective study. A total of 19,650 cells from 655 females aged from birth to 80 years were screened cytogenetically. The frequency of X chromosome loss ranged from 0.07% at age <16 years to 7.3% at >65 years of age and showed a highly significant quadratic relationship between X chromosome loss and ageing (P < or = 0.00001). We have produced a graphic representation that provides a minimum baseline age-related rate of X chromosome loss. This should assist diagnostic cytogenetics laboratories to determine the significance of 45,X cell lines detected in women of all ages. We also compared the frequency of 45,X cells in women referred with at least one spontaneous abortion with those referred for other reasons and found no significant difference. Thus, in our population, an excess of 45,X cells is not associated with pregnancy loss. Copyright 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17317957     DOI: 10.1159/000098184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  44 in total

1.  Possible influence of menstrual cycle on lymphocyte X chromosome mosaicism.

Authors:  K Gersak; M Perme-Pohar; A Veble; B M Gersak
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Low-level X Chromosome Mosaicism: A Common Finding in Women Undergoing IVF.

Authors:  Sophia Zachaki; Elisavet Kouvidi; Amelia Pantou; Haroula Tsarouha; Anastasios Mitrakos; Georgia Tounta; Ioanna Charalampous; Kalliopi N Manola; Emmanuel Kanavakis; Ariadni Mavrou
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 3.  Noninvasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy using cell-free DNA - New implications for maternal health.

Authors:  Lisa Hui
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2016-06-07

4.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome abnormalities: a source of confusion.

Authors:  Erkan Kalafat; Mehmet Murat Seval; Batuhan Turgay; Acar Koç
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-01-28

5.  The proportion of diploid 46,XX cells increases with time in women with Turner syndrome--a 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Denes; Kerstin Landin-Wilhelmsen; Yvonne Wettergren; Inger Bryman; Charles Hanson
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2015-01-14

6.  Epigenetic Regulation of DNA Repair Pathway Choice by MacroH2A1 Splice Variants Ensures Genome Stability.

Authors:  Robin Sebastian; Eri K Hosogane; Eric G Sun; Andy D Tran; William C Reinhold; Sandra Burkett; David M Sturgill; Prabhakar R Gudla; Yves Pommier; Mirit I Aladjem; Philipp Oberdoerffer
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 7.  Genetic considerations in the patient with Turner syndrome--45,X with or without mosaicism.

Authors:  Quincy Zhong; Lawrence C Layman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 8.  Current best practice in the management of Turner syndrome.

Authors:  Roopa Kanakatti Shankar; Philippe F Backeljauw
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 3.565

9.  The Personal Genome Project Canada: findings from whole genome sequences of the inaugural 56 participants.

Authors:  Miriam S Reuter; Susan Walker; Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram; Joe Whitney; Iris Cohn; Neal Sondheimer; Ryan K C Yuen; Brett Trost; Tara A Paton; Sergio L Pereira; Jo-Anne Herbrick; Richard F Wintle; Daniele Merico; Jennifer Howe; Jeffrey R MacDonald; Chao Lu; Thomas Nalpathamkalam; Wilson W L Sung; Zhuozhi Wang; Rohan V Patel; Giovanna Pellecchia; John Wei; Lisa J Strug; Sherilyn Bell; Barbara Kellam; Melanie M Mahtani; Anne S Bassett; Yvonne Bombard; Rosanna Weksberg; Cheryl Shuman; Ronald D Cohn; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; Sarah Bowdin; Matthew R Hildebrandt; Wei Wei; Asli Romm; Peter Pasceri; James Ellis; Peter Ray; M Stephen Meyn; Nasim Monfared; S Mohsen Hosseini; Ann M Joseph-George; Fred W Keeley; Ryan A Cook; Marc Fiume; Hin C Lee; Christian R Marshall; Jill Davies; Allison Hazell; Janet A Buchanan; Michael J Szego; Stephen W Scherer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  GIN'n'CIN hypothesis of brain aging: deciphering the role of somatic genetic instabilities and neural aneuploidy during ontogeny.

Authors:  Yuri B Yurov; Svetlana G Vorsanova; Ivan Y Iourov
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.