Literature DB >> 17317584

Pharmacokinetic disposition and clinical outcomes in infants and children receiving intravenous busulfan for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Tal Schechter1, Yaron Finkelstein, John Doyle, Zulfikarali Verjee, Myla Moretti, Gideon Koren, L Lee Dupuis.   

Abstract

We conducted a retrospective pharmacokinetic analysis of i.v. busulfan in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and describe its relation to transplantation outcomes. Forty-five children (median age, 3 yr) underwent HSCT at The Hospital for Sick Children from April 2003 through January 2006 and received i.v. busulfan every 6 h as part of their conditioning regimen. Initial busulfan doses were based on actual patient weight: <9 kg, 0.95 mg/kg per dose; 9-16 kg, 1.2 mg/kg per dose; 16-23 kg, 1.1 mg/kg per dose; 24-34 kg, 0.95 mg/kg per dose; >34 kg, 0.8 mg/kg per dose. Plasma busulfan concentrations were obtained after the first dose. The fourth and subsequent busulfan doses were adjusted to achieve an area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) of 900-1500 microM.min. Development of hepatic venous occlusive disease (HVOD; modified Baltimore criteria) and engraftment (absolute neutrophil count >or=0.5 x 10(9)/L) were evaluated. Busulfan pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using 1-compartment methods. Mean busulfan pharmacokinetic parameters were maximum concentration (C(max); 4.7 +/- 0.75 microM), volume of distribution at steady state (0.68 +/- 0.17 L/kg), elimination rate constant (0.0051 +/- 0.0010 min(-1)), total body clearance (3.5 +/- 1.23 mL/[min.kg]), and AUC (1271 +/- 280 microM.min). Mean volume of distribution at steady state was larger in children <1 yr of age (0.77 +/- 0.24 vs 0.64 +/- 0.11 L/kg; P = .040) and children <4 yr of age (0.73 +/- 0.18 vs 0.60 +/- 0.11 L/kg; P = .001) than in older children. Compared with older children, mean weight-adjusted total body clearance was higher in children <4 yr of age (3.8 +/- 1.40 versus 3.0 +/- 0.76 mL/[min.kg]). HVOD was diagnosed in 8 children (18%), including 4 children <1 yr of age. Children who developed HVOD achieved a lower C(max) than did those without HVOD (4.2 +/- 0.68 versus 4.8 +/- 0.73 microM; P = .035). Other than C(max), no association was observed between busulfan disposition and development of HVOD in children for whom i.v. busulfan doses were adjusted to achieve a target AUC. The influence of factors other than busulfan disposition on transplantation outcomes, such as genetic polymorphisms, should be evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17317584     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2006.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  17 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic monitoring is still required for intravenous busulfan in SCT for small children.

Authors:  Masayuki Nagasawa; Noriko Mitsuiki; Toshiaki Ono; Masatoshi Takagi; Hiromi Oda; Masato Yasuhara; Shuki Mizutani
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Intravenous busulfan: in the conditioning treatment of pediatric patients prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Sheridan M Hoy; Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.022

3.  Personalized pharmacokinetic targeting with busulfan in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Takayuki Takachi; Yuki Arakawa; Hiroyoshi Nakamura; Tomoyuki Watanabe; Yuki Aoki; Junjiro Ohshima; Yoshihiro Takahashi; Masahiro Hirayama; Takako Miyamura; Kanji Sugita; Katsuyoshi Koh; Keizo Horibe; Eiichi Ishii; Shuki Mizutani; Daisuke Tomizawa
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Should busulfan therapeutic range be narrowed in pediatrics? Experience from a large cohort of hematopoietic stem cell transplant children.

Authors:  M Philippe; S Goutelle; J Guitton; X Fonrose; C Bergeron; P Girard; Y Bertrand; N Bleyzac
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Busulfan in infant to adult hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: a population pharmacokinetic model for initial and Bayesian dose personalization.

Authors:  Jeannine S McCune; Meagan J Bemer; Jeffrey S Barrett; K Scott Baker; Alan S Gamis; Nicholas H G Holford
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan in children: revised body weight-dependent NONMEM® model to optimize dosing.

Authors:  Christian Diestelhorst; Joachim Boos; Jeannine S McCune; Georg Hempel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Review of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous Busulfan in Paediatric Patients.

Authors:  Rachael Lawson; Christine E Staatz; Christopher J Fraser; Stefanie Hennig
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Variability in the pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulphan given as a single daily dose to paediatric blood or marrow transplant recipients.

Authors:  Christa E Nath; John W Earl; Nalini Pati; Katherine Stephen; Peter J Shaw
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Variation in prescribing patterns and therapeutic drug monitoring of intravenous busulfan in pediatric hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  Jeannine S McCune; K Scott Baker; David K Blough; Alan Gamis; Meagan J Bemer; Megan C Kelton-Rehkopf; Laura Winter; Jeffrey S Barrett
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.126

10.  Effect of age on the pharmacokinetics of busulfan in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation; an alliance study (CALGB 10503, 19808, and 100103).

Authors:  Jan H Beumer; Kouros Owzar; Lionel D Lewis; Chen Jiang; Julianne L Holleran; Susan M Christner; William Blum; Steven Devine; Jonathan E Kolitz; Charles Linker; Ravi Vij; Edwin P Alyea; Richard A Larson; Mark J Ratain; Merrill J Egorin
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.