Literature DB >> 1731726

The pattern visual evoked potential and pattern electroretinogram in drusen-associated optic neuropathy.

G B Scholl1, H S Song, D E Winkler, S H Wray.   

Abstract

Sixteen patients (29 eyes) with optic disc drusen were studied prospectively for clinical and electrophysiologic evidence of impaired optic nerve conduction. Abnormalities were detected in the following areas: visual acuity, eight (28%) of 29 eyes; kinetic visual field, 22 (76%) of 29 eyes; results of Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test, 12 (41%) of 29 eyes; and flash visual evoked potential, 13 (54%) of 24 eyes. Simultaneous pattern visual evoked potentials and results of pattern electroretinograms were recorded. The P100 latency of the pattern visual evoked potential was prolonged in 41% of eyes. The P50 and N95 components of the pattern electroretinogram were also analyzed. The P50 amplitude was reduced in only four (17%) of 24 eyes. The most common abnormality was a reduction in amplitude or the absence of the N95 component in 19 (79%) of 24 eyes, reflecting ganglion cell dysfunction. The data support mounting evidence that the P50 and N95 components of the pattern electroretinogram have different retinal origins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1731726     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080130077029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Optic disc drusen].

Authors:  M Schargus; E Gramer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  Optic Nerve Head Drusen: An Update.

Authors:  Edward Palmer; Jesse Gale; Jonathan G Crowston; Anthony P Wells
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2018-04-25

3.  Influence of simultaneous pattern-reversal electroretinogram recording on visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Y Matsui; I Saito; S Okinami; S Oono
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  The effects of optic disc drusen on the latency of the pattern-reversal checkerboard and multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Tomas M Grippo; Isaac Ezon; Fabio N Kanadani; Boonchai Wangsupadilok; Celso Tello; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Optic disk drusen in children.

Authors:  Melinda Y Chang; Stacy L Pineles
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 6.048

6.  Factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen.

Authors:  Kyoung Min Lee; Se Joon Woo; Jeong-Min Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.