Literature DB >> 17316973

A simple measure of the coding efficiency of a neuronal population.

Emilio Salinas1, Nicholas M Bentley.   

Abstract

We derive a simple measure for quantifying the average accuracy with which a neuronal population can represent a stimulus. This quantity, the basis set error, has three key properties: (1) it makes no assumptions about the form of the neuronal responses; (2) it depends only on their second order statistics, so although it is easy to compute, it does take noise correlations into account; (3) its magnitude has an intuitive interpretation in terms of the accuracy with which information can be extracted from the population using a simple method-"simple" meaning linear. We use the basis set error to characterize the efficacy of several types of population codes generated synthetically in a computer. In general, the basis set error typically ranks different encoding schemes in a way that is qualitatively similar to Shannon's mutual information, except when nonlinear readout methods are necessary. Because this measure is concerned with signals that can be read out easily (i.e., through linear operations), it provides a lower bound on coding accuracy relative to the computational capabilities that are accessible to a neuronal population.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17316973      PMCID: PMC2041886          DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2006.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosystems        ISSN: 0303-2647            Impact factor:   1.973


  12 in total

1.  Do simple cells in primary visual cortex form a tight frame?

Authors:  E Salinas; L F Abbott
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Correlated neuronal discharges that increase coding efficiency during perceptual discrimination.

Authors:  Ranulfo Romo; Adrián Hernández; Antonio Zainos; Emilio Salinas
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  MSTd neuronal basis functions for the population encoding of heading direction.

Authors:  S Ben Hamed; W Page; C Duffy; A Pouget
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance.

Authors:  K H Britten; M N Shadlen; W T Newsome; J A Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Reconstruction of the postsubiculum head direction signal from neural ensembles.

Authors:  Adam Johnson; Kelsey Seeland; A David Redish
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Vector reconstruction from firing rates.

Authors:  E Salinas; L F Abbott
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  A theory of how the brain might work.

Authors:  T Poggio
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1990

8.  Representational capacity of face coding in monkeys.

Authors:  L F Abbott; E T Rolls; M J Tovee
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Head position signals used by parietal neurons to encode locations of visual stimuli.

Authors:  P R Brotchie; R A Andersen; L H Snyder; S J Goodman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance.

Authors:  E Zohary; M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-07-14       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.