Literature DB >> 1731651

Prognostic factors influencing survival in gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas. Implications for surgical management and staging.

E H Ng1, R E Pollock, M F Munsell, E N Atkinson, M M Romsdahl.   

Abstract

The appropriate surgical therapeutic options for either localized or more advanced disease in patients with gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas remain unclear. A staging classification for this disease has not been adopted nor risk factors identifying patients at risk for recurrence defined. To address these issues, this study evaluated the influence of various clinicopathologic variables on overall and disease-free survival. In an univariate analysis of overall survival involving 191 patients, the Cox proportional hazards model identified four factors that were associated with a significantly better outcome: complete resection without tumor rupture (p less than 0.001), localized lesions (p less than 0.001), low grade of tumor (p = 0.02), and tumors smaller than 5 cm (p = 0.03). When interactive effects of these factors were taken into account, however, type of resection of the tumor was selected as the only significant prognostic factor in a multivariate analysis. Complete resection without tumor rupture improved overall survival of patients with localized disease (median, 46 months) as well as those with contiguous organ invasion (median, 36 months) or peritoneal implants (median, 36 months). In contrast, patients with incomplete resections survived for a median of 21 months. Patients with tumor rupture, despite removal of all gross disease, behaved similarly to those with incomplete resections; median survival was only 17 months. For disease-free survival, important determinants selected from a multivariate analysis were tumor rupture (p = 0.002), contiguous organ invasion (p = 0.02) and high tumor grade (p = 0.02). A staging classification incorporating these prognostic factors of significance was evaluated using a TGM system: T1 (less than 5 cm), T2 (greater than or equal to 5 cm), T3 (contiguous organ invasion or peritoneal implants), T4 (tumor rupture); G: G1 (low grade), G2 (high grade); M: M0 (no metastases), M1 (metastases present). The corresponding 5-year overall survivals for stages I, II, III, IVA, and IVB were 75%, 52%, 28%, 12%, and 7%. Disease-free survival at 2 years after surgery was 89%, 57%, and 47% for stages I, II, and III, respectively. In conclusion, surgery remains the primary modality of treatment for patients with gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas, and complete resection of all disease without tumor rupture, even of locally advanced disease, improves overall and disease-free survival. A staging classification appears feasible and is recommended to determine outcome in patients with leiomyosarcomas arising from the gastrointestinal tract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1731651      PMCID: PMC1242372          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199201000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  15 in total

1.  Calculation of survival rates for cancer.

Authors:  J BERKSON; R P GAGE
Journal:  Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin       Date:  1950-05-24

2.  A computer program for comparing K samples with right-censored data.

Authors:  E T Lee; M M Desu
Journal:  Comput Programs Biomed       Date:  1972-11

Review 3.  Gastrointestinal sarcomas.

Authors:  J D Licht; L B Weissmann; K Antman
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  Primary colorectal sarcoma. A retrospective review and prognostic factor study of 50 consecutive patients.

Authors:  S Meijer; T Peretz; J J Gaynor; C Tan; S I Hajdu; M F Brennan
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1990-09

5.  Smooth muscle tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. A study of 56 cases followed for a minimum of 10 years.

Authors:  H L Evans
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Gastrointestinal sarcomas. Analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  P C McGrath; J P Neifeld; W Lawrence; S Kay; J S Horsley; G A Parker
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Myosarcomas of the small and large intestine: a clinicopathologic study.

Authors:  M H Shiu; G H Farr; R A Egeli; S H Quan; S I Hajdu
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Gastric leiomyosarcoma: clinical and pathological review of fifty patients.

Authors:  P C Lindsay; N Ordonez; J H Raaf
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 9.  Smooth muscle tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. What we know now that Stout didn't know.

Authors:  H D Appelman
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 10.  Leiomyosarcoma of the gastro-intestinal tract: general pattern of metastasis and recurrence.

Authors:  Y T Lee
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 12.111

View more
  107 in total

1.  NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  George D Demetri; Margaret von Mehren; Cristina R Antonescu; Ronald P DeMatteo; Kristen N Ganjoo; Robert G Maki; Peter W T Pisters; Chandrajit P Raut; Richard F Riedel; Scott Schuetze; Hema M Sundar; Jonathan C Trent; Jeffrey D Wayne
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Advances in the surgical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  Umer I Chaudhry; Ronald P DeMatteo
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2011

3.  Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival.

Authors:  R P DeMatteo; J J Lewis; D Leung; S S Mudan; J M Woodruff; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumour: varied presentation of a rare disease.

Authors:  Trevor Bardell; Diederick W Jalink; David J Hurlbut; C Dale Mercer
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 5.  Tailored management of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Mark S Etherington; Ronald P DeMatteo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Ménétrier disease and gastrointestinal stromal tumors: hyperproliferative disorders of the stomach.

Authors:  Robert J Coffey; Mary Kay Washington; Christopher L Corless; Michael C Heinrich
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Laparoscopic wedge resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: initial experience.

Authors:  Yoshinari Mochizuki; Yasuhiro Kodera; Michitaka Fujiwara; Seiji Ito; Yoshitaka Yamamura; Akira Sawaki; Kenji Yamao; Tomoyuki Kato
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Surgical margin status and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  António M Gouveia; Amadeu P Pimenta; Ana F Capelinha; Dionísio de la Cruz; Paula Silva; José M Lopes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: outcomes of surgical management and analysis of prognostic variables.

Authors:  Haluk R Unalp; Hayrullah Derici; Erdinc Kamer; Ali D Bozdag; Ercument Tarcan; Mehmet A Onal
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 10.  A clinical and biological overview of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Myrna Candelaria; Jaime de la Garza; Alfonso Duenas-Gonzalez
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.