Literature DB >> 17316208

Demographic and socio-economic associations with academic attainment (UCAS tariff scores) in applicants to medical school.

David Powis1, David James, Eamonn Ferguson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the United Kingdom medical students are selected predominantly on their academic merit. Their academic achievement marks are equated via the tariff point score structure administered by the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS). We studied the applicant databases for 1998-2003 for one English medical school to determine the factors that predict high tariff point scores.
METHODS: Complete demographic data and relative socio-economic status, educational institution attended and tariff point score was available for 8997 UK applicants aged 21 years or younger to the 5-year Bachelor of Medicine/Bachelor of Surgery (BM BS) course at Nottingham University medical school (and partially complete data for a further 1891 applicants). The data were subjected to standard univariate and multivariate analyses and to path analysis.
RESULTS: In these samples, the independent predictors of a high tariff point score were being younger and male. The effect sizes were small, although significant. Higher tariff point scores were achieved by those from households less materially disadvantaged. Ethnicity was also a predictor with white, Chinese and those of mixed ethnic origin achieving higher tariff point scores than those from other groups. Finally, the type of school attended predicted academic achievement with applicants from further education colleges, independent schools and grant-maintained schools achieving higher tariff point scores.
CONCLUSION: Notwithstanding the relatively homogeneous (predominantly young, white, high academic achievers) applicant pool to a single UK medical school we identified consistent significant predictors of high tariff point scores. As high tariff point scores are still the major entry criterion to UK medical schools, our findings will be of value in informing policy decisions concerning 'widening access' schemes being established at government request.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17316208     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02683.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  8 in total

1.  The value of the UK Clinical Aptitude Test in predicting pre-clinical performance: a prospective cohort study at Nottingham Medical School.

Authors:  Janet Yates; David James
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  The graduate entry generation: a qualitative study exploring the factors influencing the career expectations and aspirations of a graduating cohort of graduate entry dental students in one London institution.

Authors:  Paul Newton; Lyndon Cabot; Nairn H F Wilson; Jennifer E Gallagher
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Predictive validity of the UK clinical aptitude test in the final years of medical school: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Adrian Husbands; Alistair Mathieson; Jonathan Dowell; Jennifer Cleland; Rhoda MacKenzie
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  The 'dark side' and 'bright side' of personality: when too much conscientiousness and too little anxiety are detrimental with respect to the acquisition of medical knowledge and skill.

Authors:  Eamonn Ferguson; Heather Semper; Janet Yates; J Edward Fitzgerald; Anya Skatova; David James
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Socio-economic predictors of performance in the Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test (UMAT).

Authors:  Ian B Puddey; Annette Mercer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Academic Performance of Students with the Highest and Mediocre School-leaving Grades: Does the Aptitude Test for Medical Studies (TMS) Balance Their Prognoses?

Authors:  Guni Kadmon; Martina Kadmon
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2016-02-15

7.  Lessons learned from 15 years of non-grades-based selection for medical school.

Authors:  Karen M Stegers-Jager
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  A comparison of undergraduate outcomes for students from gateway courses and standard entry medicine courses.

Authors:  Sally Curtis; Daniel Smith
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.