Literature DB >> 17316147

Adjunctive dexmedetomidine therapy in the intensive care unit: a retrospective assessment of impact on sedative and analgesic requirements, levels of sedation and analgesia, and ventilatory and hemodynamic parameters.

Robert MacLaren1, Laurel K Forrest, Tyree H Kiser.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine if adjunctive dexmedetomidine therapy in intensive care patients alters requirements for and levels of sedation and analgesia, and to describe hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters.
DESIGN: Retrospective, noncontrolled, descriptive study of clinical practice.
SETTING: Four intensive care units (ICUs; medical, surgical, neurosurgical, or burn) in a university-affiliated medical center. PATIENTS: Forty patients who were already receiving sustained use of propofol, lorazepam, or fentanyl when dexmedetomidine was started.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Medical records were identified by searching the pharmacy database for patients who had received continuous-infusion dexmedetomidine from January 2000-January 2003 while in one of the four ICUs. Primary end points were discontinuation or dosage reduction of other sedatives or fentanyl from the hour before to 6 hours after starting dexmedetomidine. Other outcomes included levels of sedation and analgesia before and after dexmedetomidine and description of ventilatory and hemodynamic parameters. The initial dexmedetomidine rate of 0.4 +/- 0.25 microg/kg/hour changed minimally through 47.4 +/- 61.1 infusion hours. At 6 hours, 11 of 13 patients receiving propofol, 14 of 23 receiving lorazepam, and 4 of 30 receiving fentanyl had the respective agent discontinued. With dexmedetomidine, the hourly rates and cumulative daily doses were reduced only for propofol. Adequate sedation occurred at rates of 64.6% and 47.9% during the 24-hour periods before and after dexmedetomidine was started, respectively (p=0.001). Four and 12 patients had severe agitation before and after, respectively (p=0.05). One and 12 patients had severe pain before and after, respectively (p=0.02). Nine patients experienced hypotension or bradycardia. Twenty-two patients were successfully extubated within 24 hours of starting dexmedetomidine.
CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive dexmedetomidine reduces sedative requirements but does not alter analgesic requirements. However, dexmedetomidine was associated with enhanced agitation, severe pain, and hemodynamic compromise. Transitioning to dexmedetomidine from other sedatives and analgesics may not provide optimal sedation and analgesia. Future studies are needed to evaluate dexmedetomidine as a bridge to extubation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17316147     DOI: 10.1592/phco.27.3.351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  9 in total

1.  Evaluating the use of dexmedetomidine in neurocritical care patients.

Authors:  Tina M Grof; Kathleen A Bledsoe
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Tackling agitated delirium--the tip of the iceberg.

Authors:  Valerie J Page
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Dexmedetomidine versus propofol/midazolam for long-term sedation during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Esko Ruokonen; Ilkka Parviainen; Stephan M Jakob; Silvia Nunes; Maija Kaukonen; Stephen T Shepherd; Toni Sarapohja; J Raymond Bratty; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Analgo-sedation of patients with burns outside the operating room.

Authors:  Cesare Gregoretti; Daniela Decaroli; Quirino Piacevoli; Alice Mistretta; Nicoletta Barzaghi; Nicola Luxardo; Irene Tosetti; Luisa Tedeschi; Laura Burbi; Paolo Navalesi; Fabio Azzeri
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Guided by Bispectral Index and Sedation-Agitation Scale.

Authors:  Manoj Tripathi; Virendra Kumar; Mahendra B Kalashetty; Deepak Malviya; Prateek Singh Bais; Om Prakash Sanjeev
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

Review 6.  The effects of herbal medicine on epilepsy.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Tongtong Ge; Zhenxiang Pan; Yashu Leng; Jiayin Lv; Bingjin Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-18

7.  Outcomes When Using Adjunct Dexmedetomidine with Propofol Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Surgical Intensive Care Patients.

Authors:  Jessica M Louie; Nick W Lonardo; Mary C Mone; Vanessa W Stevens; Rishi Deka; Wayne Shipley; Richard G Barton
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-28

Review 8.  The incidence of sub-optimal sedation in the ICU: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel L Jackson; Clare W Proudfoot; Kimberley F Cann; Tim S Walsh
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Interpatient variability in dexmedetomidine response: a survey of the literature.

Authors:  Samantha F Holliday; Sandra L Kane-Gill; Philip E Empey; Mitchell S Buckley; Pamela L Smithburger
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-01-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.