Literature DB >> 1731549

Sedation and recovery of psychomotor function after intravenous administration of various doses of midazolam and diazepam.

E J Nuotto1, K T Korttila, J L Lichtor, P L Ostman, G Rupani.   

Abstract

A placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial in 11 healthy male volunteers compared clinical sedation and psychomotor function after intravenous injection of midazolam (0.05, 0.1, or 0.15 mg/kg), diazepam (0.15 or 0.3 mg/kg), or placebo (saline). The depth of sedation was estimated at 5-10-min intervals during the first hour after injection. A comprehensive battery of psychomotor tests was used to collect objective data of psychomotor performance before drug injection and 1, 3, 5, and 7 h after injection. Midazolam (0.15 mg/kg) produced the highest scores of sedation and most impairment of psychomotor performance. In most tests, the maximal psychomotor effects seen after 0.3 mg/kg of diazepam did not reach those of 0.1 mg/kg of midazolam. Although the strongest psychomotor effects were induced by midazolam, these effects disappeared sooner than those of diazepam. By 5 h after injection, 0.3 mg/kg of diazepam showed the highest scores of psychomotor impairment. The authors conclude that at least four times as much diazepam as midazolam is needed to produce equally severe psychomotor impairment. That the residual effects of midazolam terminate sooner than those of diazepam probably accounts for the occasional underestimation of the potency of midazolam in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1731549     DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199202000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  9 in total

1.  Intravenous sedation prior to peribulbar anaesthesia for cataract surgery in elderly patients.

Authors:  D H Wong; P M Merrick
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Risk Factors for Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation and Delayed Extubation Following Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Christian I Schwer; Teresa Roth; Mathieu Gass; René Rothweiler; Torsten Loop; Marc C Metzger; Johannes Kalbhenn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Subjective, behavioral and physiological responses to intravenous meperidine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  J P Zacny; J L Lichtor; W Binstock; D W Coalson; T Cutter; D C Flemming; B Glosten
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Comparison of cognitive, ambulatory, and psychomotor recovery profiles after day care anesthesia with propofol and sevoflurane.

Authors:  Satyen Parida; Ashok Shankar Badhe
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Small bolus injections of intravenous midazolam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a study of 788 consecutive cases.

Authors:  M R Smith; G D Bell; M A Quine; G M Spencer; A E Morden; J G Jones
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparison of alfentanil-midazolam and meperidine-diazepam.

Authors:  M B Donnelly; W A Scott; D S Daly
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Cardiopulmonary effects and recovery characteristics associated with 2 sedative protocols for assisted ventilation in healthy neonatal foals.

Authors:  Carolyn L Kerr; Stephanie C J Keating; Luis G Arroyo; Laurent Viel
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.310

8.  Psychomotor and cognitive effects of 15-minute inhalation of methoxyflurane in healthy volunteers: implication for post-colonoscopy care.

Authors:  Nam Q Nguyen; Jenna Burgess; Tamara L Debreceni; Leanne Toscano
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-11-08

9.  Effects of midazolam or tramadol premedication on early cognitive function in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A randomized, controlled, double-blind study.

Authors:  Hulya Ulusoy; Ilker Coskun; Mehmet Arslan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 1.671

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.