Literature DB >> 17315135

[Quality assurance in sociomedical evaluation].

R Legner1, W Cibis.   

Abstract

Presented is the work of the Quality Assurance in Sociomedical Evaluation Project Group and its findings so far. The Project Group has developed a quality assurance concept for the outcome quality of sociomedical evaluations with personal examination and for evaluations on the basis of medical records. The quality criteria proposed by the Project Group are divided into primary as well as particular criteria. The primary criteria are: plausibility and conclusiveness, reproducibility, neutrality; the particular criteria are: formal and content programming, medical-scientific foundations, understandability, completeness, transparency, and efficiency. Both, the primary and the particular criteria are operationalized through examination questions. To fulfill a primary quality criterion, all related examination questions have to be answered in the affirmative. The particular criteria are related using a scoring system. The quality assurance programme also provides for a peer-review procedure; however, the manual for this procedure has yet to be developed. Research projects will be needed to determine the methodological requirements that have to be fulfilled for the proposed peer review procedure. Prior to implementation of the programme with the financially responsible pension insurance agencies it will be necessary to estimate the amount of time and manpower involved.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17315135     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-958531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rehabilitation (Stuttg)        ISSN: 0034-3536            Impact factor:   1.113


  4 in total

1.  An instrument for quality assurance in work capacity evaluation: development, evaluation, and inter-rater reliability.

Authors:  André Strahl; Christian Gerlich; Georg W Alpers; Jörg Gehrke; Annette Müller-Garnn; Heiner Vogel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Interviews for the assessment of long-term incapacity for work: a study on adherence to protocols and principles.

Authors:  Wout E L de Boer; Haije Wind; Frank J H van Dijk; Han H B M Willems
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Problems with sickness certification tasks: experiences from physicians in different clinical settings. A cross-sectional nationwide study in Sweden.

Authors:  Therese Ljungquist; Elin Hinas; Gunnar H Nilsson; Catharina Gustavsson; Britt Arrelöv; Kristina Alexanderson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Development and evaluation of a standardized peer-training in the context of peer review for quality assurance in work capacity evaluation.

Authors:  André Strahl; Christian Gerlich; Georg W Alpers; Katja Ehrmann; Jörg Gehrke; Annette Müller-Garnn; Heiner Vogel
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.