Literature DB >> 17314312

Preservation of ejaculated mouse spermatozoa from fertile C57BL/6 and infertile Hook1/Hook1 mice collected from the uteri of mated females.

Yasuhiro Yamauchi1, Monika A Ward.   

Abstract

Methods routinely used to preserve mouse spermatozoa require that the male be killed to recover spermatozoa from the epididymides. Here we obtained multiple samples of ejaculated spermatozoa from normal fertile C57BL/6 and infertile Hook1/Hook1 (formerly known as azh/azh) mutant males from uteri after mating, thus avoiding termination of the males. Ejaculated sperm were preserved by conventional cryopreservation or by rapid freezing without cryoprotection, and were injected into the oocytes by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The proportions of oocytes that survived, became activated, and developed into two-cell embryos were similar when comparing the two preservation methods in wild-type versus Hook1/Hook1 mice and tested mice versus controls (fresh and rapid-frozen epididymal and fresh ejaculated sperm). Two-cell embryos were transferred into the oviducts of pseudopregnant females, and fetal development was examined at Day 15 of gestation. A total of 39%-54% of transferred embryos produced with preserved ejaculated sperm implanted. Live, normal fetuses (11%-17%) were obtained in all examined groups and from all males included in the study. More implants (71%-82%) and fetuses (28%-31%) were noted in controls. Lower developmental potentials of embryos produced with preserved ejaculated sperm might be due to their capacitation status; the majority of sperm retrieved from the uterus were capacitated. This study bears significance for the maintenance and distribution of novel mouse strains. The method is applicable for all types of mice, including those with male infertility syndromes. The sole requirement is that the male of interest is able to copulate and its ejaculate contains spermatozoa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17314312     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.059881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  8 in total

1.  m6A-dependent biogenesis of circular RNAs in male germ cells.

Authors:  Chong Tang; Yeming Xie; Tian Yu; Na Liu; Zhuqing Wang; Rebekah J Woolsey; Yunge Tang; Xinzong Zhang; Weibing Qin; Ying Zhang; Ge Song; Weiwei Zheng; Juan Wang; Weitian Chen; Xiongyi Wei; Zhe Xie; Rachel Klukovich; Huili Zheng; David R Quilici; Wei Yan
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 25.617

2.  Microsurgical and Percutaneous Epididymal Sperm Aspiration for Sperm Collection from Live Mice.

Authors:  Auke Boersma; Olga Olszanska; Ingrid Walter; Thomas Rülicke
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Effects of vaginal septa on the reproductive performance of BALB/cByJNarl mice.

Authors:  Tsung-Keng Chang; Peiyin Ho; Chung-Tiang Liang; Chun-Keung Yu
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Sperm patch-clamp.

Authors:  Polina Lishko; David E Clapham; Betsy Navarro; Yuriy Kirichok
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Selection against spermatozoa with fragmented DNA after postovulatory mating depends on the type of damage.

Authors:  Juan D Hourcade; Miriam Pérez-Crespo; Raúl Fernández-González; Belén Pintado; Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-01-31       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Biopsy of embryos produced by in vitro fertilization affects development in C57BL/6 mouse strain.

Authors:  Atsushi Sugawara; Monika A Ward
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Mouse zygotes respond to severe sperm DNA damage by delaying paternal DNA replication and embryonic development.

Authors:  Joanna E Gawecka; Joel Marh; Michael Ortega; Yasuhiro Yamauchi; Monika A Ward; W Steven Ward
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Ejaculated mouse sperm enter cumulus-oocyte complexes more efficiently in vitro than epididymal sperm.

Authors:  Honggang Li; Pei-Hsuan Hung; Susan S Suarez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.