OBJECTIVE: Previous cardiac operation has traditionally been considered as a potential risk factor for patients undergoing heart transplantation. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing heart transplantation as a second cardiac procedure and compare it with primary heart transplantation, using meta-analytical methodology. METHODS: A literature search was undertaken to identify relevant comparative studies. Outcomes of interest were classified into four categories: (a) intra-operative times; (b) post-operative outcomes; (c) resources; (d) actuarial outcomes. RESULTS: Seven studies matched the selection criteria, reporting on 1004 patients. Six hundred and twenty-three had transplantation as primary operation and 381 as re-operation. The 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year mortality were similar for the two groups (HR=0.85, p=0.54; HR=0.97, p=0.88; and HR=1.04, p=0.92, respectively). Total operative, cold-ischaemic, by-pass, and cross-clamp times were significantly longer for the re-operation group by 59.44 (p<0.001), 14.62 (p=0.05), 25.24 (p<0.001), and 7.93 (p<0.001)min, respectively. Both ICU and hospital stay were longer for the re-operation group but only the former was statistically significant (WMD=1.37; p=0.02). Post-operative complications were similar, except re-exploration rate and blood transfusion requirement, which were higher in the re-operation group (OR=3.51; p<0.001 and WMD=2.21; p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Heart transplantation following previous cardiac operation is technically demanding requiring longer operative times compared to primary heart transplantation. It does not, however, add a significant risk to the survival of the patient, and associated morbidity is not significantly compromised.
OBJECTIVE: Previous cardiac operation has traditionally been considered as a potential risk factor for patients undergoing heart transplantation. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing heart transplantation as a second cardiac procedure and compare it with primary heart transplantation, using meta-analytical methodology. METHODS: A literature search was undertaken to identify relevant comparative studies. Outcomes of interest were classified into four categories: (a) intra-operative times; (b) post-operative outcomes; (c) resources; (d) actuarial outcomes. RESULTS: Seven studies matched the selection criteria, reporting on 1004 patients. Six hundred and twenty-three had transplantation as primary operation and 381 as re-operation. The 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year mortality were similar for the two groups (HR=0.85, p=0.54; HR=0.97, p=0.88; and HR=1.04, p=0.92, respectively). Total operative, cold-ischaemic, by-pass, and cross-clamp times were significantly longer for the re-operation group by 59.44 (p<0.001), 14.62 (p=0.05), 25.24 (p<0.001), and 7.93 (p<0.001)min, respectively. Both ICU and hospital stay were longer for the re-operation group but only the former was statistically significant (WMD=1.37; p=0.02). Post-operative complications were similar, except re-exploration rate and blood transfusion requirement, which were higher in the re-operation group (OR=3.51; p<0.001 and WMD=2.21; p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Heart transplantation following previous cardiac operation is technically demanding requiring longer operative times compared to primary heart transplantation. It does not, however, add a significant risk to the survival of the patient, and associated morbidity is not significantly compromised.
Authors: Timothy J George; Claude A Beaty; Gregory A Ewald; Stuart D Russell; Ashish S Shah; John V Conte; Glenn J Whitman; Scott C Silvestry Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Doğan Emre Sert; Ümit Kervan; Sinan Sabit Kocabeyoğlu; Mehmet Karahan; Şeref Alp Küçüker; Mehmet Ali Özatik; Feyza Ayşenur Paç; Mustafa Paç Journal: Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 0.332