Literature DB >> 17313722

Effects of a healthy meal course on spontaneous energy intake, satiety and palatability.

Peter C Poortvliet1, Sonia Bérubé-Parent, Vicky Drapeau, Benoit Lamarche, John E Blundell, Angelo Tremblay.   

Abstract

Many food components can influence satiety or energy intake. Combined together, these food components could represent an interesting dietary strategy in the prevention and treatment of obesity. The aims of this study were: 1) to determine the effect of a functional food in the form of a healthy meal course on subsequent energy intake and satiety; 2) to verify if it is possible to maintain palatability while preserving the satiating effects of the test meal. Thirteen subjects were invited to eat two lunch sessions: healthy and control meal courses (2090 kJ/meal). Anthropometric and ad libitum food intake measurements, and visual analogue scales (VAS) were performed during the two lunch sessions. The healthy main course acutely decreased energy intake during the rest of the meal (-744 kJ, P<or=0 x 0001) and lipid (-6 %, P<or=0 x 0001) compared with the control meal. VAS ratings during the course of the testing showed a meal effect for hunger, desire to eat and prospective food consumption (P<or=0 x 05) and a time effect for all appetite sensations (P<or=0 x 0001). VAS scores on hunger ratings were lower for the healthy meal (P<or=0 x 05), whereas fullness ratings were higher shortly after the healthy main course (P<or=0 x 05). The healthy meal produced a slightly higher palatability rating but this effect was not statistically significant. These results suggest that it is possible to design a healthy meal that decreases spontaneous energy intake and hunger without compromising palatability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17313722     DOI: 10.1017/S000711450738135X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  6 in total

1.  Effects of energy content and energy density of pre-portioned entrées on energy intake.

Authors:  Alexandria D Blatt; Rachel A Williams; Liane S Roe; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 2.  The Impact of Restrictive and Non-restrictive Dietary Weight Loss Interventions on Neurobehavioral Factors Related to Body Weight Control: the Gaps and Challenges.

Authors:  Sylvain Iceta; Shirin Panahi; Isabel García-García; Andréanne Michaud
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2021-07-27

3.  Healthy eating at school to compensate for the activity-related obesigenic lifestyle in children and adolescents: the Quebec experience.

Authors:  Angelo Tremblay; Hélène Arguin
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 4.  Increased Intake of Foods with High Nutrient Density Can Help to Break the Intergenerational Cycle of Malnutrition and Obesity.

Authors:  Barbara Troesch; Hans K Biesalski; Rolf Bos; Erik Buskens; Philip C Calder; Wim H M Saris; Jörg Spieldenner; Henkjan J Verkade; Peter Weber; Manfred Eggersdorfer
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Weak Satiety Responsiveness Is a Reliable Trait Associated with Hedonic Risk Factors for Overeating among Women.

Authors:  Michelle Dalton; Sophie Hollingworth; John Blundell; Graham Finlayson
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Impact of chemotherapy on perceptions related to food intake in women with breast cancer: A prospective study.

Authors:  Eduarda da Costa Marinho; Isis Danyelle Dias Custódio; Isabela Borges Ferreira; Cibele Aparecida Crispim; Carlos Eduardo Paiva; Yara Cristina de Paiva Maia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.