Literature DB >> 17313716

Differential effects of dietary whey, casein and soya on colonic DNA damage and large bowel SCFA in rats fed diets low and high in resistant starch.

Shusuke Toden1, Anthony R Bird, David L Topping, Michael A Conlon.   

Abstract

Feeding higher levels of dietary animal protein (as casein or red meat) increases colonic DNA damage and thins the colonic mucus barrier in rats. Feeding resistant starch (RS) reverses these changes and increases large bowel SCFA. The present study examined whether high dietary dairy (casein or whey) or plant (soya) proteins had similar adverse effects and whether dietary RS was protective. Adult male rats were fed diets containing 15 or 25 % casein, whey or soya protein with or without 48 % high amylose starch (as a source of RS) for 4 weeks. DNA damage was measured in isolated colonocytes using the comet assay. Higher dietary casein and soya (but not whey) increased colonocyte DNA damage. DNA damage was highest with soya when fed at 15 or 25 % protein without RS. Dietary RS attenuated protein-induced colonocyte DNA damage in all groups but it remained significantly higher in rats fed 25 % soya compared with those fed 15 % protein. Dietary protein level did not affect colonic mucus thickness overall but the barrier was thinner in rats fed high dietary casein. This effect was reversed by feeding RS. Caecal total SCFA and butyrate pools were higher in rats fed RS compared with digestible starch. Caecal and faecal SCFA were unrelated to genetic damage but correlated with mucus thickness. The present data confirm that higher dietary protein affected colonocyte DNA and colonic mucus thickness adversely but that proteins differ in their effects on these indices of colon health. The data show also that these changes were reversed by RS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17313716     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114507336817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  20 in total

Review 1.  Personalizing protein nourishment.

Authors:  David C Dallas; Megan R Sanctuary; Yunyao Qu; Shabnam Haghighat Khajavi; Alexandria E Van Zandt; Melissa Dyandra; Steven A Frese; Daniela Barile; J Bruce German
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 11.176

Review 2.  Proteolytic Systems in Milk: Perspectives on the Evolutionary Function within the Mammary Gland and the Infant.

Authors:  David C Dallas; Niamh M Murray; Junai Gan
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.673

3.  Fasting and engineered diets as powerful tool in the medical practice: an old approach in the new era.

Authors:  Concetta Panebianco; Adele Potenza; Valerio Pazienza
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-11

Review 4.  Diet, microorganisms and their metabolites, and colon cancer.

Authors:  Stephen J D O'Keefe
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Prebiotic Supplementation of In Vitro Fecal Fermentations Inhibits Proteolysis by Gut Bacteria, and Host Diet Shapes Gut Bacterial Metabolism and Response to Intervention.

Authors:  Xuedan Wang; Glenn R Gibson; Adele Costabile; Manuela Sailer; Stephan Theis; Robert A Rastall
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  The interactive effect of dietary n-6: n-3 fatty acid ratio and vitamin E level on tissue lipid peroxidation, DNA damage in intestinal epithelial cells, and gut morphology in chickens of different ages.

Authors:  P Konieczka; M Barszcz; M Choct; S Smulikowska
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Tempe consumption modulates fecal secondary bile acids, mucins, immunoglobulin A, enzyme activities, and cecal microflora and organic acids in rats.

Authors:  Zaki Utama; Yukako Okazaki; Hiroyuki Tomotake; Norihisa Kato
Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 8.  Resistant starch: promise for improving human health.

Authors:  Diane F Birt; Terri Boylston; Suzanne Hendrich; Jay-Lin Jane; James Hollis; Li Li; John McClelland; Samuel Moore; Gregory J Phillips; Matthew Rowling; Kevin Schalinske; M Paul Scott; Elizabeth M Whitley
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 8.701

9.  Genomic homeostasis is dysregulated in favour of apoptosis in the colonic epithelium of the azoxymethane treated rat.

Authors:  Caroline A Kerr; Barney M Hines; Janet M Shaw; Robert Dunne; Lauren M Bragg; Julie Clarke; Trevor Lockett; Richard Head
Journal:  BMC Physiol       Date:  2013-01-23

10.  Xylo-oligosaccharides and inulin affect genotoxicity and bacterial populations differently in a human colonic simulator challenged with soy protein.

Authors:  Claus T Christophersen; Anne Petersen; Tine R Licht; Michael A Conlon
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.