BACKGROUND/AIM: The treatment of esophageal (noncardiac) chest pain is unsatisfactory and there is no approved therapy. A previous uncontrolled study suggested that theophylline may be useful. Our aims were to investigate the effects of theophylline on esophageal sensorimotor function and chest pain. METHODS: In a double-blind study, sensory and biomechanical properties of the esophagus were assessed using impedance planimetry in 16 patients with esophageal hypersensitivity, after intravenoustheophylline or placebo. In a second, randomized 4-wk crossover study, oral theophylline and placebo were administered to 24 patients with esophageal hypersensitivity. Frequency, intensity, and duration of chest pain episodes were evaluated. RESULTS: After IV theophylline, chest pain thresholds (P=0.027) and esophageal cross-sectional area (P=0.03) increased and the esophageal wall became more distensible (P=0.04) compared with placebo. After oral theophylline, the number of painful days (P=0.03) and chest pain episodes (P=0.025), pain duration (P=0.002), and its severity (P=0.031) decreased. Overall symptoms improved in 58% on theophylline and 6% on placebo (P<0.02). There was no order effect. CONCLUSIONS:Theophylline relaxed the esophageal wall, decreased hypersensitivity, and improved chest pain. Theophylline is effective in the treatment of functional chest pain.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/AIM: The treatment of esophageal (noncardiac) chest pain is unsatisfactory and there is no approved therapy. A previous uncontrolled study suggested that theophylline may be useful. Our aims were to investigate the effects of theophylline on esophageal sensorimotor function and chest pain. METHODS: In a double-blind study, sensory and biomechanical properties of the esophagus were assessed using impedance planimetry in 16 patients with esophageal hypersensitivity, after intravenous theophylline or placebo. In a second, randomized 4-wk crossover study, oral theophylline and placebo were administered to 24 patients with esophageal hypersensitivity. Frequency, intensity, and duration of chest pain episodes were evaluated. RESULTS: After IV theophylline, chest pain thresholds (P=0.027) and esophageal cross-sectional area (P=0.03) increased and the esophageal wall became more distensible (P=0.04) compared with placebo. After oral theophylline, the number of painful days (P=0.03) and chest pain episodes (P=0.025), pain duration (P=0.002), and its severity (P=0.031) decreased. Overall symptoms improved in 58% on theophylline and 6% on placebo (P<0.02). There was no order effect. CONCLUSIONS:Theophylline relaxed the esophageal wall, decreased hypersensitivity, and improved chest pain. Theophylline is effective in the treatment of functional chest pain.