BACKGROUND: Medicolegal, clinical, and reimbursement needs warrant complete and accurate documentation. We sought to identify and improve our compliance rate for the documentation of arterial catheterization in the perioperative setting. METHODS: We first reviewed 12 mo of electronic anesthesia records to establish a baseline compliance rate for arterial catheter documentation. Residents and Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists were randomly assigned to a control group and experimental group. When surgical incision and anesthesia end were documented in the electronic record keeper, a reminder routine checked for an invasive arterial blood pressure tracing. If a case used an arterial catheter, but no procedure note was observed, the resident or Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist assigned to the case was sent an automated alphanumeric pager and e-mail reminder. Providers in the control group received no pager or e-mail message. After 2 mo, all staff received the reminders. RESULTS: A baseline compliance rate of 80% was observed (1963 of 2459 catheters documented). During the 2-mo study period, providers in the control group documented 152 of 202 (75%) arterial catheters, and the experimental group documented 177 of 201 (88%) arterial lines (P < 0.001). After all staff began receiving reminders, 309 of 314 arterial lines were documented in a subsequent 2 mo period (98%). Extrapolating this compliance rate to 12 mo of expected arterial catheter placement would result in an annual incremental $40,500 of professional fee reimbursement. CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of the tertiary care process results in documentation deficiencies. Inexpensive automated reminders can drastically improve compliance without the need for complicated negative or positive feedback.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Medicolegal, clinical, and reimbursement needs warrant complete and accurate documentation. We sought to identify and improve our compliance rate for the documentation of arterial catheterization in the perioperative setting. METHODS: We first reviewed 12 mo of electronic anesthesia records to establish a baseline compliance rate for arterial catheter documentation. Residents and Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists were randomly assigned to a control group and experimental group. When surgical incision and anesthesia end were documented in the electronic record keeper, a reminder routine checked for an invasive arterial blood pressure tracing. If a case used an arterial catheter, but no procedure note was observed, the resident or Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist assigned to the case was sent an automated alphanumeric pager and e-mail reminder. Providers in the control group received no pager or e-mail message. After 2 mo, all staff received the reminders. RESULTS: A baseline compliance rate of 80% was observed (1963 of 2459 catheters documented). During the 2-mo study period, providers in the control group documented 152 of 202 (75%) arterial catheters, and the experimental group documented 177 of 201 (88%) arterial lines (P < 0.001). After all staff began receiving reminders, 309 of 314 arterial lines were documented in a subsequent 2 mo period (98%). Extrapolating this compliance rate to 12 mo of expected arterial catheter placement would result in an annual incremental $40,500 of professional fee reimbursement. CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of the tertiary care process results in documentation deficiencies. Inexpensive automated reminders can drastically improve compliance without the need for complicated negative or positive feedback.
Authors: Thomas Corey Davis; Jeffrey A Green; Alexander Colquhoun; Brenda L Hage; Chuck Biddle Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2012-03-17 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: George A Mashour; Roy K Esaki; John C Vandervest; Amy Shanks; Sachin Kheterpal Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2009-08-08 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Terrence L Trentman; Jeff T Mueller; Keith J Ruskin; Brie N Noble; Christine A Doyle Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2011-07-05 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Bala G Nair; Katherine Grunzweig; Gene N Peterson; Mayumi Horibe; Moni B Neradilek; Shu-Fang Newman; Gail Van Norman; Howard A Schwid; Wei Hao; Irl B Hirsch; E Patchen Dellinger Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Allan F Simpao; Jonathan M Tan; Arul M Lingappan; Jorge A Gálvez; Sherry E Morgan; Michael A Krall Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Gen Li; Chelsie J K Dietz; Robert E Freundlich; Matthew S Shotwell; Jonathan P Wanderer Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Matthew D McEvoy; William R Furman; Dylan Snyder; Warren S Sandberg Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 7.892