Literature DB >> 17312071

Comparative accuracy of renal duplex sonographic parameters in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: paired and unpaired analysis.

Gabrielle J Williams1, Petra Macaskill, Siew F Chan, Thomas E Karplus, Winkle Yung, Elisabeth M Hodson, Jonathan C Craig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the test performance of duplex sonographic parameters in screening for hemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis, which occurs in approximately 5% of persons with hypertension.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to find studies on the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis in which duplex sonography and intraarterial angiography were compared and in which sensitivity and specificity were calculated. MEDLINE (1966-2005), EMBASE (1988-2005), and reference lists were searched and the authors contacted. Data were subjected to meta-analysis according to the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve model. Heterogeneity in test performance relating to population and design features was investigated.
RESULTS: From 1,357 titles, 88 studies involving 9,974 arteries in 8,147 patients were included. The following four parameters were evaluated: peak systolic velocity (21 studies), acceleration time (13 studies), acceleration index (13 studies), and renal-aortic ratio (13 studies). The corresponding diagnostic odds ratios (ORs) were 60.9 (95% CI, 28.3-131.2), 28.9 (95% CI, 7.1-117.2), 16.0 (95% CI, 5.1-50.6), and 29.3 (95% CI, 12.7-67.7). Results based on studies in which parameters were directly compared showed that peak systolic velocity had greater accuracy than renal-aortic ratio (relative diagnostic OR, 1.8; p = 0.03; nine studies) and acceleration index (relative diagnostic OR, 5.3; p < 0.001; five studies). Acceleration time versus acceleration index showed no evidence of a difference in accuracy (relative diagnostic OR, 1.1; p = 0.65; nine studies). Analysis of peak systolic velocity used in combination with other parameters compared with peak systolic velocity alone (seven studies) showed evidence of a shift in test positivity (p < 0.001) but only weak evidence of improvement in accuracy (relative diagnostic OR, 1.6; p = 0.09).
CONCLUSION: Sonography is a moderately accurate screening test for renal artery stenosis. The single measurement, peak systolic velocity, has the highest performance characteristics, an expected sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 92%. Additional measurements do not increase accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17312071     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.0355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  35 in total

1.  Standard method for ultrasound evaluation of renal arterial lesions.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  New onset hypertension-rare intimal variant fibromuscular dysplasia.

Authors:  Jagadeesh K Kalavakunta; Hemasri Tokala; Vishal Gupta
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2011-07-21

3.  Evidence-based practice guideline for the treatment of CKD.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 4.  Re-evaluating the Appropriateness of Non-invasive Arterial Vascular Imaging and Diagnostic Modalities.

Authors:  Jason M Misher; Andrew M Galmer; Mitchell W Weinberg; John S Pellerito; Joe F Lau
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-08

Review 5.  [Imaging of visceral vessels].

Authors:  C Stelzner; N Abolmaali; U Hecker; S Schellong
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 6.  Renal Doppler to assess renal perfusion in the critically ill: a reappraisal.

Authors:  David Schnell; Michael Darmon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Diagnostic criteria for renovascular disease: where are we now?

Authors:  Sandra M S Herrmann; Stephen C Textor
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 8.  Clinical practice. Renal-artery stenosis.

Authors:  Lance D Dworkin; Christopher J Cooper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  To Stent or Not to Stent? Update on Revascularization for Atherosclerotic Renovascular Disease.

Authors:  Elias Noory; Kaji Sritharan; Thomas Zeller
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 10.  Imaging in the evaluation of renovascular disease.

Authors:  Kjell Tullus; Derek J Roebuck; Clare A McLaren; Stephen D Marks
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.