Literature DB >> 17312053

Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival.

Gareth J R Porter1, Andrew J Evans, Eleanor J Cornford, Helen C Burrell, Jonathan J James, Andrew H S Lee, Jayeta Chakrabarti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to assess the effect of mammographic parenchymal pattern on patient survival, mammographic features, and pathologic features of breast cancer in a screened population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We classified the parenchymal pattern (according to BI-RADS) of 759 screened women who presented with a screening-detected (n = 455) or interval (n = 304) invasive breast cancer. Pathologic details (tumor size, histologic grade, lymph node stage, vascular invasion, and histologic type) and mammographic appearances were recorded. Breast cancer-specific survival was ascertained, with a median follow-up of 9.0 years.
RESULTS: An excess of interval cancers was seen in women with dense breasts (p < 0.0001). Screening-detected (but not interval) tumors were significantly smaller in fatty breasts (p = 0.014). Tumor grade, lymph node stage, vascular invasion, and histologic type did not vary significantly with mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected or interval cancers. Screening-detected cancers in fatty breasts were more likely to appear as indistinct (p = 0.003) or spiculated (p = 0.002) masses in contrast to cancers in dense breasts, which more commonly appeared as architectural distortions (p < 0.0001). No significant breast cancer-specific survival difference was seen by mammographic parenchymal pattern for screening-detected cancers (p = 0.75), interval cancers (p = 0.82), or both groups combined (p = 0.12).
CONCLUSION: The prognosis of screened women presenting with breast cancer is unrelated to dense mammographic parenchymal pattern despite an excess of interval cancers and larger screening-detected tumors in this group. These data support the mammographic screening of women with dense parenchymal patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17312053     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  35 in total

1.  Breast cancer risk by breast density, menopause, and postmenopausal hormone therapy use.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Andrea J Cook; Diana S M Buist; Steve R Cummings; Celine Vachon; Pamela Vacek; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Does the degree of background enhancement in breast MRI affect the detection and staging of breast cancer?

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu; Masako Kasami; Junichiro Watanabe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Breast density influences tumor subtypes and tumor aggressiveness.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Amanda I Phipps
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Awareness of breast density and its impact on breast cancer detection and risk.

Authors:  Deborah J Rhodes; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Sarah M Jenkins; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Differences between screen-detected and interval breast cancers among BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Emily C Zabor; Elizabeth Gilbert; Michelle Stempel; Oriana Petruolo; Debra Mangino; Mark Robson; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Prognostic value of mammographic breast density in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Shereef Elsamany; Abdullah Alzahrani; Seham Abd Elkhalik; Omaima Elemam; Elham Rawah; Mian U Farooq; Musab H Almatrafi; Feras K Olayan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Randomized Trial of Personalized Breast Density and Breast Cancer Risk Notification.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas; Catherine S Giess; Kimberly A Harris; Julia Ansolabehere; Celia P Kaplan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Tumor characteristics in screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers.

Authors:  István Pálka; Gyöngyi Kelemen; Katalin Ormándi; György Lázár; Tibor Nyári; László Thurzó; Zsuzsanna Kahán
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 9.  Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review.

Authors:  Monika Nothacker; Volker Duda; Markus Hahn; Mathias Warm; Friedrich Degenhardt; Helmut Madjar; Susanne Weinbrenner; Ute-Susann Albert
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study.

Authors:  A H Olsen; K Bihrmann; M-B Jensen; I Vejborg; E Lynge
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.