Literature DB >> 17310338

Costs and quality of life of multiple sclerosis in Switzerland.

Gisela Kobelt1, Jenny Berg, Peter Lindgren, Andrea Gerfin, J Lutz.   

Abstract

This cost-of-illness analysis, based on information from 1101 patients in Switzerland, is part of a Europe-wide cost-of-illness study in multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective was to analyze the costs and quality of life (QOL) related to the level of disease severity and progression. Patients registered with the Swiss MS patient organization were asked to participate in a mail survey and 44% responded. The questionnaire asked for details on the disease (type of disease, relapses, level of functional disability), information on all medical and non-medical resource consumption, informal care and work capacity (sick leave and early retirement). In addition, patients were asked about their current QOL (measured as utility) and the level of fatigue. The mean age of respondents was 53 years, and 21% were 65 years or older. Almost one-quarter of patients in the sample (23%) had severe disease (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score > or =7), while 36% had moderate disease (EDSS score 4-6.5) and 38% had mild disease (EDSS score 0-3). The median EDSS score was 5.0, with a mean of 4.5. Mean utility was 0.53 (range, 0 = death to 1 = full health), while mean fatigue was rated as 5.4 (range, 1 = not tired to 10 = extremely tired). Utility and fatigue were worse for patients with a recent relapse. Costs and utility are highly correlated with disease severity. Workforce participation decreases from greater than 80% in early disease to less than 10% in the very late stages, while total costs increase more than fivefold between an EDSS score of 0-1 and an EDSS of 7, and by more than 40% from an EDSS score of 7 to worse states. Most cost types increase steadily until patients reach an EDSS score of 7, after which there is a sharp increase due to home care, home services and informal care. The mean annual cost per patient in the sample (65.000 Swiss francs, euro 42.000) corresponds to costs for a patient at the median EDSS score of 5. Utility decreases from 0.89 to 0.1 as the disease becomes severe, but the loss compared to the age- and gender-matched general population can be observed at all levels of the disease ( approximately 0.1 at an EDSS score of 2 to approximately 0.3 at an EDSS score of 5-6), leading to an estimated annual loss of 0.3 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) per patient in the sample. Relapses for patients with an EDSS score <5 were associated with a utility loss of 0.08 and an incremental cost of 5500 Swiss francs (euro 3.500) during the quarter in which they occurred. Health-care costs are to a large extent covered by insurance, and a substantial amount of services such as home care and home help are available to patients with severe disease. These services represent approximately 15% of total societal costs and are largely covered, resulting in almost 30% of total costs to different payers. Despite this, a large amount of costs falls on families providing care, in particular for patients with severe disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17310338     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-006-0383-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  16 in total

1.  Multiple sclerosis: relapses, resource use, and costs.

Authors:  A J Hawton; C Green
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-10-05

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jessica Sharac; Paul McCrone; Ramon Sabes-Figuera
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Economic burden of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Huseyin Naci; Rachael Fleurence; Julie Birt; Amy Duhig
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Future MS care: a consensus statement of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group.

Authors:  Peter Rieckmann; Alexey Boyko; Diego Centonze; Alasdair Coles; Irina Elovaara; Eva Havrdová; Otto Hommes; Jacques Lelorier; Sarah A Morrow; Celia Oreja-Guevara; Nick Rijke; Sven Schippling
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Assessing cost-effectiveness in the management of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Ceri J Phillips; Ioan Humphreys
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2009-11-18

6.  A study on the direct and indirect costs of multiple sclerosis based on expanded disability status scale score in khuzestan, iran.

Authors:  Amin Torabipour; Zahra Ahmadi Asl; Nastaran Majdinasab; Roya Ghasemzadeh; Hamed Tabesh; Mohammad Arab
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2014-09

7.  Variables related to working capability among Swiss patients with multiple sclerosis--a cohort study.

Authors:  Oliver Findling; Magdalena Baltisberger; Simon Jung; Christian P Kamm; Heinrich P Mattle; Johann Sellner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Cost of Illness of Multiple Sclerosis - A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Olivia Ernstsson; Hanna Gyllensten; Kristina Alexanderson; Petter Tinghög; Emilie Friberg; Anders Norlund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Relationship of depression, disability, and family caregiver attitudes to the quality of life of Kuwaiti persons with multiple sclerosis: a controlled study.

Authors:  Asmahan F Alshubaili; Abdel W Awadalla; Jude U Ohaeri; Asser A Mabrouk
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  Differences in utility scores obtained through Brazilian and UK value sets: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Maíra Libertad Soligo Takemoto; Nilceia Lopes da Silva; Ana Carolina Padula Ribeiro-Pereira; Arthur Orlando Correa Schilithz; Cibele Suzuki
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.