Literature DB >> 17310127

Adaptive two-stage analysis of genetic association in case-control designs.

Gang Zheng1, Kijoung Song, Robert C Elston.   

Abstract

We study a two-stage analysis of genetic association for case-control studies. In the first stage, we compare Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium coefficients between cases and controls and, in the second stage, we apply the Cochran- Armitage trend test. The two analyses are statistically independent when Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium holds in the population, so all the samples are used in both stages. The significance level in the first stage is adaptively determined based on its conditional power. Given the level in the first stage, the level for the second stage analysis is determined with the overall Type I error being asymptotically controlled. For finite sample sizes, a parametric bootstrap method is used to control the overall Type I error rate. This two-stage analysis is often more powerful than the Cochran-Armitage trend test alone for a large association study. The new approach is applied to SNPs from a real study.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17310127     DOI: 10.1159/000099830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  10 in total

1.  Choosing an optimal method to combine P-values.

Authors:  Sungho Won; Nathan Morris; Qing Lu; Robert C Elston
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A general framework for two-stage analysis of genome-wide association studies and its application to case-control studies.

Authors:  James M S Wason; Frank Dudbridge
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Incorporating parental information into family-based association tests.

Authors:  Zhaoxia Yu; Daniel Gillen; Carey F Li; Michael Demetriou
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Single-marker and two-marker association tests for unphased case-control genotype data, with a power comparison.

Authors:  Sulgi Kim; Nathan J Morris; Sungho Won; Robert C Elston
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Phase uncertainty in case-control association studies.

Authors:  Sungho Won; Sulgi Kim; Robert C Elston
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Accounting for multiple comparisons in a genome-wide association study (GWAS).

Authors:  Randall C Johnson; George W Nelson; Jennifer L Troyer; James A Lautenberger; Bailey D Kessing; Cheryl A Winkler; Stephen J O'Brien
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Capitalizing on admixture in genome-wide association studies: a two-stage testing procedure and application to height in African-Americans.

Authors:  Guolian Kang; Guimin Gao; Sanjay Shete; David T Redden; Bao-Li Chang; Timothy R Rebbeck; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Nicholas M Pajewski; David B Allison
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Complex pedigrees in the sequencing era: to track transmissions or decorrelate?

Authors:  Dalin Li; Jin Zhou; Duncan C Thomas; David W Fardo
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Screening and replication using the same data set: testing strategies for family-based studies in which all probands are affected.

Authors:  Amy Murphy; Scott T Weiss; Christoph Lange
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Genome-wide association studies using an adaptive two-stage analysis for a case-control design.

Authors:  Kijoung Song; Qing Lu; Xiwu Lin; Dawn Waterworth; Robert C Elston
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2007-12-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.