Literature DB >> 17309552

Non-invasive evaluation of tumour hypoxia in the Shionogi tumour model for prostate cancer with 18F-EF5 and positron emission tomography.

Donald T T Yapp1, Janet Woo, Aileen Kartono, Jonathan Sy, Thomas Oliver, Kirsten A Skov, Cameron J Koch, Hans Adomat, Wieslawa H Dragowska, Ladan Fazli, Ladan Fadzli, Thomas Ruth, Michael J Adam, David Green, Martin Gleave.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate hypoxia non-invasively in androgen-dependent (AD), regressing (6-days after castration, RG) and androgen-independent (AI) Shionogi tumours, using the radiolabelled tracer for hypoxia, 18F-EF5, and positron emission tomography (PET).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Groups of mice bearing AD, RG and AI Shionogi tumours were co-injected with 18F-EF5 and unlabelled EF5. The mice were imaged non-invasively with PET to examine the accumulation of 18F-EF5 in hypoxic regions of the tumour. The tumours were subsequently placed in a gamma-counter, or disaggregated for flow cytometry, to determine the levels of 18F-EF5 and the percentage of hypoxic cells present in the tumour, respectively.
RESULTS: The mean (sd) levels of hypoxia in AD Shionogi tumours decreased significantly 6 days after androgen ablation as measured by flow cytometry, from 17.1 (4.77) to 1.74 (0.46)% (P=0.003). There were no significant differences in the levels of 18F-EF5 in the tissue between AD and RG tumours using region-of-interest analysis of PET images or gamma-counting, although the differences were significant when measured by flow cytometry. However, mean (sd) levels of hypoxia in AI Shionogi tumours were significantly higher than in AD tumours regardless of the analysis method; PET, 10.5 (4.93)x10(-5)) Bq/cm2 (P=0.017), flow cytometry, 42.98 (3.35)% (P<0.001), well count, 6.81 (1.17)x10(4) and 13.1 (1.99)x10(4) cpm/g, for AD and AI tumours, respectively (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in hypoxia between AD and AI, but not RG, Shionogi tumours can be detected non-invasively with 18F-EF5 and PET. As prostate tumours are hypoxic and the oxygen levels can change with androgen ablation, noninvasive imaging of hypoxia with PET and 18F-EF5 might ultimately have a prognostic and/or diagnostic role in the clinical management of the disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17309552     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06761.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of the Hypoxia PET Tracer (18)F-EF5 to Immunohistochemical Marker EF5 in 3 Different Human Tumor Xenograft Models.

Authors:  Satish K Chitneni; Gerald T Bida; Michael R Zalutsky; Mark W Dewhirst
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Molecular imaging of prostate cancer: PET radiotracers.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Multimodal approaches to high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Koupparis; M E Gleave
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  Synergistic action of image-guided radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Jennifer A Locke; Alan Dal Pra; Stéphane Supiot; Padraig Warde; Robert G Bristow
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Positron emission tomography to assess hypoxia and perfusion in lung cancer.

Authors:  Eline E Verwer; Ronald Boellaard; Astrid Am van der Veldt
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

Review 6.  Molecular imaging of hypoxia with radiolabelled agents.

Authors:  Gilles Mees; Rudi Dierckx; Christel Vangestel; Christophe Van de Wiele
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Current molecular imaging positron emitting radiotracers in oncology.

Authors:  Aizhi Zhu; Hyunsuk Shim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-02-01

8.  Probing hypoxia-induced staurosporine resistance in prostate cancer cells with a microfluidic culture system.

Authors:  Grishma Khanal; Scott Hiemstra; Dimitri Pappas
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 9.  How to Modulate Tumor Hypoxia for Preclinical In Vivo Imaging Research.

Authors:  Sven De Bruycker; Christel Vangestel; Steven Staelens; Tim Van den Wyngaert; Sigrid Stroobants
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.161

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.