Literature DB >> 17309351

Exploring underutilization of videophones in hospice settings.

Michele Day1, George Demiris, Debra Parker Oliver, Karen Courtney, Brian Hensel.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate hospice providers' attitudes and perceptions regarding videophone technology in settings where the technology was introduced but underutilized. Specifically, the project seeks to provide an in-depth understanding of attitudes and perceptions that may lead to failure of a telehealth implementation in the hospice setting in the context of the technology acceptance model. Two hospice agencies were selected as a purposive sample. Both agencies had acquired videophones that were meant to be integrated into care delivery but ultimately were underutilized or never used. Interviews with staff were conducted over the telephone. The interview guide was constructed to capture staff perceptions and attitudes concerning videophone technology. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed for content analysis. A total of 17 (n = 17) participants (2 hospice administrators, 1 hospice management staff, 10 nurse case managers, and 4 social workers) were interviewed. Participants found videophones to be useful in hospice care but expressed specific practical challenges, such as lack of equipment reliability, lack of human resources, and lack of clarity pertaining to caregiver eligibility criteria. While perceived usefulness of videophones was high among respondents, practical concerns can be interpreted as lack of perceived ease of use. Findings indicate that the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) provides a good framework for an understanding of telehealth underutilization. Staff perceived that videophones were useful, but they were discouraged by their perception that the videophones were not reliable or easy to use and by their uncertainty about the cases that they were best suited for. Lessons learned are integrated into a randomized clinical trial currently under development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17309351     DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2006.0023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  11 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the evidence base for telehospice.

Authors:  Debra Parker Oliver; George Demiris; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Karla Washington; Tami Day; Hannah Novak
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Recruitment challenges and strategies in a home-based telehealth study.

Authors:  Debra Parker Oliver; George Demiris; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Karla Washington; Davina Porock
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.536

3.  Home Internet use among hospice service recipients: recommendations for Web-based interventions.

Authors:  Karla T Washington; George Demiris; Debra Parker Oliver; Michele Day
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  [Individual determinants of the Quebec electronic health record adoption].

Authors:  H Mezni; Gagnon M-P; J Duplantie
Journal:  Prat Organ Soins       Date:  2009

5.  A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model in Health Informatics.

Authors:  Bahlol Rahimi; Hamed Nadri; Hadi Lotfnezhad Afshar; Toomas Timpka
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 6.  Implementation science: implications for intervention research in hospice and palliative care.

Authors:  George Demiris; Debra Parker Oliver; Daniel Capurro; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2013-04-04

7.  Comparison of two user interfaces for accessing context-specific information resources related to hazards and near misses.

Authors:  Po-Yin Yen; Haomiao Jia; Leanne M Currie; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 8.  The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care.

Authors:  Richard J Holden; Ben-Tzion Karsh
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.317

9.  Factors relating to home telehealth acceptance and usage compliance.

Authors:  Rachael Wade; Colleen Cartwright; Kelly Shaw
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2012-04-20

10.  mHealth Series: Factors influencing sample size calculations for mHealth-based studies - A mixed methods study in rural China.

Authors:  Michelle Helena van Velthoven; Ye Li; Wei Wang; Xiaozhen Du; Li Chen; Qiong Wu; Azeem Majeed; Yanfeng Zhang; Josip Car
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.413

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.