Literature DB >> 17308168

Poor responders in IVF: cancellation of a first cycle is not predictive of a subsequent failure.

Stavroula Baka1, Evangelos Makrakis, Despoina Tzanakaki, Socrates Konidaris, Dimitris Hassiakos, Theodoros Moustakarias, George Creatsas.   

Abstract

Management of women with a poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation during IVF remains a frustrating challenge. The present study included 96 cycles from an equal number of women with a poor ovarian response and successful oocyte retrieval. Poor response was defined by the presence of at least one of the following characteristics: three or fewer oocytes on retrieval, serum estradiol level less than 500 pg/mL on the day of hCG administration, and serum FSH levels less than 20 IU/L. The same patients had a previous cycle cancelled because of a poor ovarian response whereas in the second cycle they preferred to continue the treatment despite the poor prognosis. We obtained 241 oocytes in the 96 IVF cycles. The fertilization rate was 60.2%. Three oocytes per cycle were retrieved in 56 cycles (58.3%), two oocytes per cycle in 33 cycles (34.4%), and one oocyte per cycle in 7 cycles (7.3%). In 19 cycles (19.8%) no fertilization was achieved. An embryo transfer was finally performed in 74 out of 96 cycles. Pregnancy rate was 12.5% per cycle and 16.2% per transfer. Among the 12 pregnancies achieved, 7 were in the 3-oocyte cycles and 5 in the 2-oocyte cycles. No pregnancies were achieved in the 1-oocyte cycles. Our data demonstrate that continuation of therapy in poor responders undergoing IVF can be an option despite the low pregnancy rates. The prognosis of these patients is not affected by a poor response in the first cycle and for some of them the outcome can be favorable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17308168     DOI: 10.1196/annals.1365.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  4 in total

1.  Testing for Ovarian Reserve in Assisted Reproduction programs: the current point of view.

Authors:  F J Broekmans
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2009

Review 2.  Defining Low Prognosis Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology: POSEIDON Criteria-The Why.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Matheus Roque; Giuliano M Bedoschi; Alessandro Conforti; Peter Humaidan; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 5.555

3.  The incidence of unexpected poor ovarian response in Chinese young women.

Authors:  Jing Zhuang; Hengli Li; Xiaohong Li; Dongmei Tian; Dan Yang; Minghui Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Future Fertility of Patients With No Embryo Transfer in Their First IVF Cycle Attempts.

Authors:  Xuli Zhu; Mingya Cao; Zhaohui Yao; Peiyang Lu; Yueming Xu; Guimin Hao; Zhiming Zhao
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 6.055

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.