Literature DB >> 17308087

Determination of cancer risk associated with germ line BRCA1 missense variants by functional analysis.

Marcelo A Carvalho1, Sylvia M Marsillac, Rachel Karchin, Siranoush Manoukian, Scott Grist, Ramona F Swaby, Turan P Urmenyi, Edson Rondinelli, Rosane Silva, Luis Gayol, Lisa Baumbach, Rebecca Sutphen, Jennifer L Pickard-Brzosowicz, Katherine L Nathanson, Andrej Sali, David Goldgar, Fergus J Couch, Paolo Radice, Alvaro N A Monteiro.   

Abstract

Germ line inactivating mutations in BRCA1 confer susceptibility for breast and ovarian cancer. However, the relevance of the many missense changes in the gene for which the effect on protein function is unknown remains unclear. Determination of which variants are causally associated with cancer is important for assessment of individual risk. We used a functional assay that measures the transactivation activity of BRCA1 in combination with analysis of protein modeling based on the structure of BRCA1 BRCT domains. In addition, the information generated was interpreted in light of genetic data. We determined the predicted cancer association of 22 BRCA1 variants and verified that the common polymorphism S1613G has no effect on BRCA1 function, even when combined with other rare variants. We estimated the specificity and sensitivity of the assay, and by meta-analysis of 47 variants, we show that variants with <45% of wild-type activity can be classified as deleterious whereas variants with >50% can be classified as neutral. In conclusion, we did functional and structure-based analyses on a large series of BRCA1 missense variants and defined a tentative threshold activity for the classification missense variants. By interpreting the validated functional data in light of additional clinical and structural evidence, we conclude that it is possible to classify all missense variants in the BRCA1 COOH-terminal region. These results bring functional assays for BRCA1 closer to clinical applicability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17308087      PMCID: PMC2936786          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  46 in total

1.  What is the value added by human intervention in protein structure prediction?

Authors:  K Karplus; R Karchin; C Barrett; S Tu; M Cline; M Diekhans; L Grate; J Casper; R Hughey
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001

Review 2.  The allelic structure of common disease.

Authors:  Desmond J Smith; Aldons J Lusis
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  A full-likelihood method for the evaluation of causality of sequence variants from family data.

Authors:  Deborah Thompson; Douglas F Easton; David E Goldgar
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Genetic counselling for familial breast and ovarian cancer in Ontario.

Authors:  A Andermann; S A Narod
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Functional assay for BRCA1: mutagenesis of the COOH-terminal region reveals critical residues for transcription activation.

Authors:  F Hayes; C Cayanan; D Barillà; A N Monteiro
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Structure of the 53BP1 BRCT region bound to p53 and its comparison to the Brca1 BRCT structure.

Authors:  Woo S Joo; Philip D Jeffrey; Sharon B Cantor; Michael S Finnin; David M Livingston; Nikola P Pavletich
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Understanding missense mutations in the BRCA1 gene: an evolutionary approach.

Authors:  Melissa A Fleming; John D Potter; Christina J Ramirez; Gary K Ostrander; Elaine A Ostrander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  BRCT repeats as phosphopeptide-binding modules involved in protein targeting.

Authors:  Isaac A Manke; Drew M Lowery; Anhco Nguyen; Michael B Yaffe
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Crystal structure of human 53BP1 BRCT domains bound to p53 tumour suppressor.

Authors:  Dean J Derbyshire; Balaku P Basu; Louise C Serpell; Woo S Joo; Takayasu Date; Kuniyoshi Iwabuchi; Aidan J Doherty
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Functional impact of missense variants in BRCA1 predicted by supervised learning.

Authors:  Rachel Karchin; Alvaro N A Monteiro; Sean V Tavtigian; Marcelo A Carvalho; Andrej Sali
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  54 in total

1.  A multilevel model to address batch effects in copy number estimation using SNP arrays.

Authors:  Robert B Scharpf; Ingo Ruczinski; Benilton Carvalho; Betty Doan; Aravinda Chakravarti; Rafael A Irizarry
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Pathogenicity of the BRCA1 missense variant M1775K is determined by the disruption of the BRCT phosphopeptide-binding pocket: a multi-modal approach.

Authors:  Marc Tischkowitz; Nancy Hamel; Marcelo A Carvalho; Gabriel Birrane; Aditi Soni; Erik H van Beers; Simon A Joosse; Nora Wong; David Novak; Louise A Quenneville; Scott A Grist; Petra M Nederlof; David E Goldgar; Sean V Tavtigian; Alvaro N Monteiro; John A A Ladias; William D Foulkes
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Characteristics of triple-negative breast cancer in patients with a BRCA1 mutation: results from a population-based study of young women.

Authors:  Eunjung Lee; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Huiyan Ma; Darcy V Spicer; David Van Den Berg; Leslie Bernstein; Giske Ursin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Assessment of functional effects of unclassified genetic variants.

Authors:  Fergus J Couch; Lene Juel Rasmussen; Robert Hofstra; Alvaro N A Monteiro; Marc S Greenblatt; Niels de Wind
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  Structural evidence for direct interactions between the BRCT domains of human BRCA1 and a phospho-peptide from human ACC1.

Authors:  Yang Shen; Liang Tong
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Expression of human BRCA1 variants in mouse ES cells allows functional analysis of BRCA1 mutations.

Authors:  Suhwan Chang; Kajal Biswas; Betty K Martin; Stacey Stauffer; Shyam K Sharan
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Analysis of a set of missense, frameshift, and in-frame deletion variants of BRCA1.

Authors:  Marcelo Carvalho; Maria A Pino; Rachel Karchin; Jennifer Beddor; Martha Godinho-Netto; Rafael D Mesquita; Renato S Rodarte; Danielle C Vaz; Viviane A Monteiro; Siranoush Manoukian; Mara Colombo; Carla B Ripamonti; Richard Rosenquist; Graeme Suthers; Ake Borg; Paolo Radice; Scott A Grist; Alvaro N A Monteiro; Blase Billack
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Clinically applicable models to characterize BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance.

Authors:  Andrew D Spearman; Kevin Sweet; Xiao-Ping Zhou; Jane McLennan; Fergus J Couch; Amanda Ewart Toland
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Toward classification of BRCA1 missense variants using a biophysical approach.

Authors:  Pamela J E Rowling; Rebecca Cook; Laura S Itzhaki
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  A simple method for co-segregation analysis to evaluate the pathogenicity of unclassified variants; BRCA1 and BRCA2 as an example.

Authors:  Leila Mohammadi; Maaike P Vreeswijk; Rogier Oldenburg; Ans van den Ouweland; Jan C Oosterwijk; Annemarie H van der Hout; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Marjolijn Ligtenberg; Margreet G Ausems; Rob B van der Luijt; Charlotte J Dommering; Johan J Gille; Senno Verhoef; Frans B Hogervorst; Theo A van Os; Encarna Gómez García; Marinus J Blok; Juul T Wijnen; Quinta Helmer; Peter Devilee; Christi J van Asperen; Hans C van Houwelingen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.