Literature DB >> 17307954

Gender and health promotion: a multisectoral policy approach.

Piroska Ostlin1, Elizabeth Eckermann, Udaya Shankar Mishra, Mwansa Nkowane, Eva Wallstam.   

Abstract

Women and men are different as regards their biology, the roles and responsibilities that society assigns to them and their position in the family and community. These factors have a great influence on causes, consequences and management of diseases and ill-health and on the efficacy of health promotion policies and programmes. This is confirmed by evidence on male-female differences in cause-specific mortality and morbidity and exposure to risk factors. Health promoting interventions aimed at ensuring safe and supportive environments, healthy living conditions and lifestyles, community involvement and participation, access to essential facilities and to social and health services need to address these differences between women and men, boys and girls in an equitable manner in order to be effective. The aim of this paper is to (i) demonstrate that health promotion policies that take women's and men's differential biological and social vulnerability to health risks and the unequal power relationships between the sexes into account are more likely to be successful and effective compared to policies that are not concerned with such differences, and (ii) discuss what is required to build a multisectoral policy response to gender inequities in health through health promotion and disease prevention. The requirements discussed in the paper include i) the establishment of joint commitment for policy within society through setting objectives related to gender equality and equity in health as well as health promotion, ii) an assessment and analysis of gender inequalities affecting health and determinants of health, iii) the actions needed to tackle the main determinants of those inequalities and iv) documentation and dissemination of effective and gender sensitive policy interventions to promote health. In the discussion of these key policy elements, we use illustrative examples of good practices from different countries around the world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17307954     DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dal048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Int        ISSN: 0957-4824            Impact factor:   2.483


  36 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of male health: the interaction of biological and social factors.

Authors:  David M de Kretser
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Using ecological momentary assessment to understand where and with whom adults' physical and sedentary activity occur.

Authors:  Yue Liao; Stephen S Intille; Genevieve F Dunton
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2015-02

3.  Gender (in)equality among employees in elder care: implications for health.

Authors:  Sofia Elwér; Lena Aléx; Anne Hammarström
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2012-01-04

4.  Gender-transformative health promotion for women: a framework for action.

Authors:  Ann Pederson; Lorraine Greaves; Nancy Poole
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.483

5.  Should public health interventions aimed at reducing childhood overweight and obesity be gender-focused?

Authors:  Aline Simen-Kapeu; Paul J Veugelers
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Healthcare utilisation and empowerment among women in Liberia.

Authors:  Heather Sipsma; Tamora A Callands; Elizabeth Bradley; Benjamin Harris; Billy Johnson; Nathan B Hansen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  A cross-national analysis of the effects of methadone maintenance and needle and syringe program implementation on incidence rates of HIV in Europe from 1995 to 2011.

Authors:  Phillip L Marotta; Charlotte A McCullagh
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2016-02-26

8.  Men and women: beliefs about cancer and about screening.

Authors:  Tracey H Sach; David K Whynes
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  The efficacy of public health information for encouraging radon gas awareness and testing varies by audience age, sex and profession.

Authors:  Natasha L Cholowsky; Jesse L Irvine; Justin A Simms; Dustin D Pearson; Weston R Jacques; Cheryl E Peters; Aaron A Goodarzi; Linda E Carlson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Gender differences in the use of insecticide-treated nets after a universal free distribution campaign in Kano State, Nigeria: post-campaign survey results.

Authors:  Ashley E Garley; Elizabeth Ivanovich; Erin Eckert; Svetlana Negroustoueva; Yazoume Ye
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.