Literature DB >> 17307893

Three-dimensional motion analysis of the lumbar spine during "free squat" weight lift training.

James C Walsh1, John F Quinlan, Robert Stapleton, David P FitzPatrick, Damian McCormack.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heavy weight lifting using a squat bar is a commonly used athletic training exercise. Previous in vivo motion studies have concentrated on lifting of everyday objects and not on the vastly increased loads that athletes subject themselves to when performing this exercise. HYPOTHESIS: Athletes significantly alter their lumbar spinal motion when performing squat lifting at heavy weights. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Forty-eight athletes (28 men, 20 women) performed 6 lifts at 40% maximum, 4 lifts at 60% maximum, and 2 lifts at 80% maximum. The Zebris 3D motion analysis system was used to measure lumbar spine motion. Exercise was performed as a "free" squat and repeated with a weight lifting support belt. Data obtained were analyzed using SAS.
RESULTS: A significant decrease (P < .05) was seen in flexion in all groups studied when lifting at 40% maximum compared with lifting at 60% and 80% of maximum lift. Flexion from calibrated 0 point ranged from 24.7 degrees (40% group) to 6.8 degrees (80% group). A significant increase (P < .05) was seen in extension when lifting at 40% maximum was compared with lifting at 60% and 80% maximum lift. Extension from calibrated 0 point ranged from -1.5 degrees (40% group) to -20.3 degrees (80% group). No statistically significant difference was found between motion seen when exercise was performed as a free squat or when lifting using a support belt in any of the groups studied.
CONCLUSION: Weight lifting using a squat bar causes athletes to significantly hyperextend their lumbar spines at heavier weights. The use of a weight lifting support belt does not significantly alter spinal motion during lifting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17307893     DOI: 10.1177/0363546506298276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  5 in total

1.  Axial and torsional stability of supracondylar femur osteotomies: biomechanical comparison of the stability of five different plate and osteotomy configurations.

Authors:  J-M Brinkman; C Hurschler; J D Agneskirchner; D Freiling; R J van Heerwaarden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Analysis of the load on the knee joint and vertebral column with changes in squatting depth and weight load.

Authors:  Hagen Hartmann; Klaus Wirth; Markus Klusemann
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Kinematic and Electromyographic Activity Changes during Back Squat with Submaximal and Maximal Loading.

Authors:  Hasan U Yavuz; Deniz Erdag
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 1.781

4.  Effect of Heel Lift Insoles on Lower Extremity Muscle Activation and Joint Work during Barbell Squats.

Authors:  Zhenghui Lu; Xin Li; Rongrong Xuan; Yang Song; István Bíró; Minjun Liang; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-08

5.  Comparison of trunk and hip muscle activity during different degrees of lumbar and hip extension.

Authors:  Sang-Min Kim; Won-Gyu Yoo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-09-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.