M Solaymani-Dodaran1, J West, C Smith, R Hubbard. 1. University of Nottingham, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK. masoud.solaymani-dodaran@nottingham.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extrinsic allergic alveolitis (EAA) is an important clinical entity, but its incidence and significance in the general population are uncertain. AIM: To estimate the incidence of EAA, and resulting mortality, in the UK. DESIGN: General-population-based cohort study in a UK primary care database (THIN). METHODS: THIN patients with an incident diagnosis of EAA were compared with a general population cohort whose members were 4:1 matched with EAA patients by age, sex and GP practice. Follow-up started at the first diagnosis of EAA (and at the same date in the matched controls) and ended at death or end of follow-up, whichever came first. Poisson, logistic, and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used; mortality rate, odd ratios, and hazard ratios were calculated. RESULTS: We identified 271 incident cases of EAA (mean age at diagnosis 57 years, 51% male). Between 1991 and 2003, the incident rate for EAA was stable at approximately 0.9 cases per 100000 person-years. In comparison to the 1084 general population controls, patients with EAA were less likely to smoke (odds ratio 0.56, 95%CI 0.39-0.81), but had a marked increase in the risk of death (hazard ratio 2.98, 95%CI 2.05-4.33). DISCUSSION: The incidence of EAA in the UK population appears to be stable overtime, and suggests about 600 new cases of EAA each year. People with EAA are less likely to smoke than the general population, but have a markedly increased mortality rate.
BACKGROUND:Extrinsic allergic alveolitis (EAA) is an important clinical entity, but its incidence and significance in the general population are uncertain. AIM: To estimate the incidence of EAA, and resulting mortality, in the UK. DESIGN: General-population-based cohort study in a UK primary care database (THIN). METHODS:THINpatients with an incident diagnosis of EAA were compared with a general population cohort whose members were 4:1 matched with EAA patients by age, sex and GP practice. Follow-up started at the first diagnosis of EAA (and at the same date in the matched controls) and ended at death or end of follow-up, whichever came first. Poisson, logistic, and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used; mortality rate, odd ratios, and hazard ratios were calculated. RESULTS: We identified 271 incident cases of EAA (mean age at diagnosis 57 years, 51% male). Between 1991 and 2003, the incident rate for EAA was stable at approximately 0.9 cases per 100000 person-years. In comparison to the 1084 general population controls, patients with EAA were less likely to smoke (odds ratio 0.56, 95%CI 0.39-0.81), but had a marked increase in the risk of death (hazard ratio 2.98, 95%CI 2.05-4.33). DISCUSSION: The incidence of EAA in the UK population appears to be stable overtime, and suggests about 600 new cases of EAA each year. People with EAA are less likely to smoke than the general population, but have a markedly increased mortality rate.
Authors: Margaret L Salisbury; Jeffrey L Myers; Elizabeth A Belloli; Ella A Kazerooni; Fernando J Martinez; Kevin R Flaherty Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Andrea L Magee; Steven M Montner; Aliya Husain; Ayodeji Adegunsoye; Rekha Vij; Jonathan H Chung Journal: Radiol Clin North Am Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Laurens J De Sadeleer; John E McDonough; Jonas C Schupp; Xiting Yan; Arno Vanstapel; Anke Van Herck; Stephanie Everaerts; Vincent Geudens; Annelore Sacreas; Tinne Goos; Celine Aelbrecht; Tim S Nawrot; Dries S Martens; Dominique Schols; Sandra Claes; Johny A Verschakelen; Eric K Verbeken; Maximilian Ackermann; Anabelle Decottignies; Manon Mahieu; Tillie-Louise Hackett; James C Hogg; Bart M Vanaudenaerde; Stijn E Verleden; Naftali Kaminski; Wim A Wuyts Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 21.405