Literature DB >> 17307436

Risk factors associated with reoperation and mortality in 252 patients after aortic valve replacement for congenitally bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Sorel Goland1, Lawrence S C Czer, Michele A De Robertis, James Mirocha, Robert M Kass, Gregory P Fontana, Wen Chang, Alfredo Trento.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the risk factors associated with mortality in patients with congenitally bicuspid aortic valve disease and dilation (<5 cm) of the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement.
METHODS: We reviewed 252 patients with bicuspid aortic valve undergoing aortic valve replacement at our institution from 1971 through 2000. Patients undergoing concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta were excluded.
RESULTS: The average patient age was 61 +/- 15 years; 66.3% were male, and 40.5% of patients had coronary artery disease. The ascending aorta was normal (<4.0 cm) in 60.3%, mildly dilated (4.0 to 4.4 cm) in 24.2%, and moderately dilated (4.5 to 4.9 cm) in 15.5% of patients. Patients with moderate aortic dilatation had significantly lower prevalence of coronary artery disease compared with patients with normal ascending aortas (20.5% and 45.4%; p = 0.006). Mean follow-up was 8.9 +/- 6.3 years. Long-term survival was significantly different across the three groups (p = 0.004). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year estimates were 78%, 59%, and 37%, respectively, in the normal aorta group; 88%, 77%, and 46%, respectively, in the mild aortic dilation group; and 92%, 83%, and 70%, respectively, in the moderate aortic dilation group. No significant difference in cardiac death was found among the groups (p = 0.08). The significant predictors of survival using the Cox regression model were coronary artery disease, age, decade of surgery, and ejection fraction. Aortic dilation was not significant after adjusting for these other variables. At follow-up, 18 patients required reoperation, 17 for aortic valve prosthesis failure and 1 for ascending aorta aneurysm.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlights the important adverse effect of concomitant coronary artery disease, advanced age, earlier decade of surgery, and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction on survival after aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve in patients with no or mild and moderate (<5 cm) dilation of the ascending aorta.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17307436     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.10.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  17 in total

1.  The surgical implications of bicuspid aortopathy.

Authors:  Karl K Limmer; Thoralf M Sundt
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01

Review 2.  Bicuspid aortic valve syndrome: a multidisciplinary approach for a complex entity.

Authors:  María Martín; Rebeca Lorca; José Rozado; Rubén Alvarez-Cabo; Juan Calvo; Isaac Pascual; Helena Cigarrán; Isabel Rodríguez; César Morís
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Current topics on bicuspid aortic valve: clinical aspects and surgical management.

Authors:  Hiroshi Furukawa; Kazuo Tanemoto
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 4.  Wireless and battery-free platforms for collection of biosignals.

Authors:  Tucker Stuart; Le Cai; Alex Burton; Philipp Gutruf
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 10.618

Review 5.  Risk of proximal aortic dissection in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: how to address this controversy?

Authors:  Evaldas Girdauskas; Kushtrim Disha; Michael A Borger; Thomas Kuntze
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-12-12

6.  Association Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid vs Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis and Mortality or Stroke.

Authors:  Raj R Makkar; Sung-Han Yoon; Martin B Leon; Tarun Chakravarty; Michael Rinaldi; Pinak B Shah; Eric R Skipper; Vinod H Thourani; Vasilis Babaliaros; Wen Cheng; Alfredo Trento; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Samir R Kapadia; Susheel Kodali; Michael J Mack; Gilbert H L Tang; Tsuyoshi Kaneko
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Individualized thoracic aortic replacement for the aortopathy of biscuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Brian Lima; Judson B Williams; S Dave Bhattacharya; Asad A Shah; Nicholas Andersen; Andrew Wang; J Kevin Harrison; G Chad Hughes
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2011-07

Review 8.  A measured approach to managing the aortic root in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Ismail El-Hamamsy; Magdi H Yacoub
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Surgical treatment of bicuspid aortic valve disease: knowledge gaps and research perspectives.

Authors:  Alessandro Della Corte; Simon C Body; Anna M Booher; Hans-Joachim Schaefers; Rita K Milewski; Hector I Michelena; Arturo Evangelista; Philippe Pibarot; Patrick Mathieu; Giuseppe Limongelli; Prem S Shekar; Sary F Aranki; Andrea Ballotta; Giuseppe Di Benedetto; Natzi Sakalihasan; Gianantonio Nappi; Kim A Eagle; Joseph E Bavaria; Alessandro Frigiola; Thoralf M Sundt
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 10.  Bicuspid aortic valve: identifying knowledge gaps and rising to the challenge from the International Bicuspid Aortic Valve Consortium (BAVCon).

Authors:  Hector I Michelena; Siddharth K Prakash; Alessandro Della Corte; Malenka M Bissell; Nandan Anavekar; Patrick Mathieu; Yohan Bossé; Giuseppe Limongelli; Eduardo Bossone; D Woodrow Benson; Patrizio Lancellotti; Eric M Isselbacher; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Thoralf M Sundt; Philippe Pibarot; Artur Evangelista; Dianna M Milewicz; Simon C Body
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.