Literature DB >> 17307313

Universal neonatal hearing screening: the Siena (Italy) experience on 19,700 newborns.

Bruno De Capua1, Daniele Costantini, Carla Martufi, Giuseppe Latini, Mattia Gentile, Claudio De Felice.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hearing loss (HL) is likely to be the most common congenital abnormality in humans, with a reported prevalence of 1 to 3 per 1000 live births. Early detection and intervention is critical to prevent the adverse consequences of a delayed diagnosis on speech, language and cognitive development. As 33-50% of all congenital HLs cannot be detected in a selective hearing risk, use of universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) programs is expanding. AIMS: We tested the value of a UNHS protocol, based on a two-stage strategy of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAEs) in all infants, followed by diagnostic auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing in those infants who did not meet TEOAE pass criteria and those infants at high risk for hearing loss.
METHODS: TEOAES (292 DP Echoport OAE Analyzer) served as the initial screen, followed by diagnostic ABR (Amplaid MK12) in newborns that did not meet pass criteria for TEOAEs. Additionally, all infants at high audiologic risk according to the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing received a diagnostic ABR evaluation. Of 21,125 total live births, 19,700 were tested (April 1, 1998-July 31, 2006). Accuracy of the UNHS strategy in predicting congenital HL was evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.
RESULTS: Prevalence for all HLs in the neonatal period was 1.78/1000 l.b. (35/19,700), with bilateral HL in 1.42/1000 l.b. (28/19,700) [low risk rate: 0.43/1000 l.b. (8/18,356); high risk infants rate: 14.88/1000 l.b. (20/1344)]. All the HL infants were diagnosed <3 and received intervention <6 months age. ROC curves results showed 100% sensitivity (95% C.I.: 89.0-100) and 99.3% specificity (95% C.I.: 99.2-99.4) of the two-stage strategy in detecting congenital HLs [area under the ROC curve: 0.997 (95% C.I.: 0.995-0.997)].
CONCLUSIONS: (1) The epidemiology of congenital HLs widely justifies UNHS; (2) a two-stage TEOAE and diagnostic ABR screening for congenital HL is feasible, minimally invasive and accurate in the early detection of congenital HL; and (3) a congenital HL screening strategy based exclusively on the use of TEOAEs should always consider the possibility of false negative cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17307313     DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Early Hum Dev        ISSN: 0378-3782            Impact factor:   2.079


  11 in total

Review 1.  Universal newborn hearing screening, a revolutionary diagnosis of deafness: real benefits and limitations.

Authors:  George X Papacharalampous; Thomas P Nikolopoulos; Dimitrios I Davilis; Ioannis E Xenellis; Stavros G Korres
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Early detection of hearing loss.

Authors:  Götz Schade
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-10-07

3.  Hearing screening outcomes in pediatric critical care survivors: a 1-year report.

Authors:  Pattita Suwannatrai; Chanapai Chaiyakulsil
Journal:  Acute Crit Care       Date:  2022-03-08

4.  Stigma in mothers of deaf children.

Authors:  Hossein Ebrahimi; Eissa Mohammadi; Mohammad Ali Mohammadi; Akbar Pirzadeh; Hamzeh Mahmoudi; Ismail Ansari
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03

Review 5.  Evaluating reporting and process quality of publications on UNHS: a systematic review of programmes.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Mincarone; Carlo Giacomo Leo; Saverio Sabina; Daniele Costantini; Francesco Cozzolino; John B Wong; Giuseppe Latini
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  Transient Evoked and Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in a Group of Neonates.

Authors:  Giovanna Cesar Silva; Camila Ribas Delecrode; Adriana Tahara Kemp; Fabiana Martins; Ana Claudia Vieira Cardoso
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-02

7.  Italian Version of the YQOL-DHH Questionnaire: Translation and Cross-cultural Adaptation.

Authors:  Manuela Gragnaniello; Claudia Celletti; Alessandra Resca; Giovanni Galeoto; Filippo Camerota
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2021-12-12

8.  The specificity and sensitivity of transient otoacustic emission in neonatal hearing screening compared with diagnostic test of auditory brain stem response in tehran hospitals.

Authors:  Jaleh Yousefi; Mohammad Ajalloueyan; Susan Amirsalari; Mahdieh Hassanali Fard
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.364

9.  Universal newborn hearing screening in the Lazio region, Italy.

Authors:  Rosaria Turchetta; Guido Conti; Pasquale Marsella; Maria Patrizia Orlando; Pasqualina Maria Picciotti; Simonetta Frezza; Francesca Yoshie Russo; Alessandro Scorpecci; Maria Gloria Cammeresi; Sara Giannantonio; Antonio Greco; Massimo Ralli
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.638

10.  Performance and characteristics of the Newborn Hearing Screening Program in Campania region (Italy) between 2013 and 2019.

Authors:  Rita Malesci; Valeria Del Vecchio; Dario Bruzzese; Ernesto Burattini; Gennaro Auletta; Monica Errichiello; Anna Rita Fetoni; Annamaria Franzè; Carla Laria; Fabiana Toscano; Antonio Caso; Elio Marciano
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.