Literature DB >> 17307102

Survival and safety of exemestane versus tamoxifen after 2-3 years' tamoxifen treatment (Intergroup Exemestane Study): a randomised controlled trial.

R C Coombes1, L S Kilburn, C F Snowdon, R Paridaens, R E Coleman, S E Jones, J Jassem, C J H Van de Velde, T Delozier, I Alvarez, L Del Mastro, O Ortmann, K Diedrich, A S Coates, E Bajetta, S B Holmberg, D Dodwell, E Mickiewicz, J Andersen, P E Lønning, G Cocconi, J Forbes, M Castiglione, N Stuart, A Stewart, L J Fallowfield, G Bertelli, E Hall, R G Bogle, M Carpentieri, E Colajori, M Subar, E Ireland, J M Bliss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early improvements in disease-free survival have been noted when an aromatase inhibitor is given either instead of or sequentially after tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with oestrogen-receptor-positive early breast cancer. However, little information exists on the long-term effects of aromatase inhibitors after treatment, and whether these early improvements lead to real gains in survival.
METHODS: 4724 postmenopausal patients with unilateral invasive, oestrogen-receptor-positive or oestrogen-receptor-unknown breast cancer who were disease-free on 2-3 years of tamoxifen, were randomly assigned to switch to exemestane (n=2352) or to continue tamoxifen (n=2372) for the remainder of a 5-year endocrine treatment period. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival; overall survival was a secondary endpoint. Efficacy analyses were intention-to-treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN11883920.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 55.7 months (range 0-89.7), 809 events contributing to the analysis of disease-free survival had been reported (354 exemestane, 455 tamoxifen); unadjusted hazard ratio 0.76 (95% CI 0.66-0.88, p=0.0001) in favour of exemestane, absolute benefit 3.3% (95% CI 1.6-4.9) by end of treatment (ie, 2.5 years after randomisation). 222 deaths occurred in the exemestane group compared with 261 deaths in the tamoxifen group; unadjusted hazard ratio 0.85 (95% CI 0.71-1.02, p=0.08), 0.83 (0.69-1.00, p=0.05) when 122 patients with oestrogen-receptor-negative disease were excluded.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that early improvements in disease-free survival noted in patients who switch to exemestane after 2-3 years on tamoxifen persist after treatment, and translate into a modest improvement in overall survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17307102     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60200-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  197 in total

Review 1.  Putting the cardiovascular safety of aromatase inhibitors in patients with early breast cancer into perspective: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Muhammad Younus; Michelle Kissner; Lester Reich; Nicola Wallis
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Hormonal therapy in breast cancer: a model disease for the personalization of cancer care.

Authors:  Shannon Puhalla; Saveri Bhattacharya; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Breast cancer: Aromatase inhibitors--bone health assessment is crucial.

Authors:  Peyman Hadji
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Defining the aromatase inhibitor musculoskeletal syndrome: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ora Singer; Tessa Cigler; Anne B Moore; Alana B Levine; Keith Hentel; Lily Belfi; Huong T Do; Lisa A Mandl
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  How we maintain bone health in early-stage breast cancer patients on aromatase inhibitors.

Authors:  Ting Bao; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Fracture risk and adjuvant hormonal therapy among a population-based cohort of older female breast cancer patients.

Authors:  J M Neuner; T W Yen; R A Sparapani; P W Laud; A B Nattinger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Is Endocrine Therapy Really Pleasant? Considerations about the Long-Term Use of Antihormonal Therapy and Its Benefit/Side Effect Ratio.

Authors:  Peter Blaha; Ruth Exner; Andrea Dal Borgo; Sinda Bigenzahn; Peter Panhofer; Otto Riedl; Sebastian Schoppmann; Thomas Bachleitner-Hofmann; Emanuel Sporn; Ursula Pluschnig; Florian Fitzal; Guenther Steger; Raimund Jakesz; Peter Dubsky; Michael Gnant
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Guidance for the prevention of bone loss and fractures in postmenopausal women treated with aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer: an ESCEO position paper.

Authors:  R Rizzoli; J J Body; A DeCensi; A De Censi; J Y Reginster; P Piscitelli; M L Brandi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Impact of the OATP1B1 c.521T>C single nucleotide polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of exemestane in healthy post-menopausal female volunteers.

Authors:  B J Gregory; S M Chen; M A Murphy; D H Atchley; L K Kamdem
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 10.  Estrogen receptor modulators and down regulators: optimal use in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Christa K Baumann; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.