Literature DB >> 17305842

Sperm competition games: the risk model can generate higher sperm allocation to virgin females.

M A Ball1, G A Parker.   

Abstract

We examine the risk model in sperm competition games for cases where female fertility increases significantly with sperm numbers (sperm limitation). Without sperm competition, sperm allocation increases with sperm limitation. We define 'average risk' as the probability q that females in the population mate twice, and 'perceived risk' as the information males gain about the sperm competition probability with individual females. If males obtain no information from individual females, sperm numbers increase with q unless sperm limitation is high and one of the two competing ejaculates is strongly disfavoured. If males can distinguish between virgin and mated females, greater sperm allocation to virgins is favoured by high sperm limitation, high q, and by the second male's ejaculate being disfavoured. With high sperm limitation, sperm allocation to virgins increases and to mated females decreases with q at high q levels. With perfect information about female mating pattern, sperm allocation (i) to virgins that will mate again exceeds that to mated females and to virgins that will mate only once, (ii) to virgins that mate only once exceeds that for mated females if q is high and there is high second male disadvantage and (iii) to each type of female can decrease with q if sperm limitation is high, although the average allocation increases at least across low q levels. In general, higher sperm allocation to virgins is favoured by: strong disadvantage to the second ejaculate, high sperm limitation, high average risk and increased information (perceived risk). These conditions may apply in a few species, especially spiders.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17305842     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01247.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  4 in total

1.  Ejaculate economics: an experimental test in a moth.

Authors:  Jin Xu; Qiao Wang
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Conceptual developments in sperm competition: a very brief synopsis.

Authors:  Geoff A Parker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Models of fertilization kinetics.

Authors:  Jussi Lehtonen
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  The effect of female quality on male ejaculatory expenditure and reproductive success in a praying mantid.

Authors:  Anuradhi Jayaweera; Katherine L Barry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.