Literature DB >> 17305268

Nursing home staff's views on quality improvement interventions: a follow-up study.

Victoria T Grando1, Marilyn J Rantz, Meridean Maas.   

Abstract

Ongoing problems with nursing home care mandates understanding nursing home staff's perspectives on innovative quality improvement programs. This follow-up study used focus groups to examine the experiences of staff who participated in a clinical trial that involved Quality Indicator (QI) feedback reports, quality improvement training, and APN consultation. The authors found that QI reports provided staff with a benchmark to judge their care and a means to track problems; APN consultation was essential for staff to learn best practices; and staff questioned the validity of the QI reports, which hindered them from seeking new solutions to problems identified in the QI reports. Findings indicate that innovative QI programs and APN consultation can positively influence nursing home quality improvement efforts and improve care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17305268     DOI: 10.3928/00989134-20070101-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs        ISSN: 0098-9134            Impact factor:   1.254


  6 in total

1.  Public reporting of nursing home quality of care: lessons from the United States experience for canadian policy discussion.

Authors:  Alison M Hutchinson; Kellie Draper; Anne E Sales
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-11

Review 2.  Enhancing Patient Safety Event Reporting. A Systematic Review of System Design Features.

Authors:  Yang Gong; Hong Kang; Xinshuo Wu; Lei Hua
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 3.  The Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set 2.0 quality indicators: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alison M Hutchinson; Doris L Milke; Suzanne Maisey; Cynthia Johnson; Janet E Squires; Gary Teare; Carole A Estabrooks
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Understanding feedback report uptake: process evaluation findings from a 13-month feedback intervention in long-term care settings.

Authors:  Anne E Sales; Kimberly Fraser; Melba Andrea B Baylon; Hannah M O'Rourke; Gloria Gao; Tracey Bucknall; Suzanne Maisey
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 5.  Clinical performance comparators in audit and feedback: a review of theory and evidence.

Authors:  Wouter T Gude; Benjamin Brown; Sabine N van der Veer; Heather L Colquhoun; Noah M Ivers; Jamie C Brehaut; Zach Landis-Lewis; Christopher J Armitage; Nicolette F de Keizer; Niels Peek
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT): a new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Benjamin Brown; Wouter T Gude; Thomas Blakeman; Sabine N van der Veer; Noah Ivers; Jill J Francis; Fabiana Lorencatto; Justin Presseau; Niels Peek; Gavin Daker-White
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 7.327

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.