Literature DB >> 17304654

Determining the minimal clinically important differences in activity, fatigue, and sleep quality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

George Wells1, Tracy Li, Lara Maxwell, Ross MacLean, Peter Tugwell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in the patient-reported outcomes of activity (0-30, number of days of limitation), fatigue (0 = none, 100 = complete), and sleep quality (0 = no problems, 100 = worst case) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS: Two randomized controlled trials comparing abatacept to placebo in RA patients were considered: ATTAIN (n = 391) and AIM (n = 652). An internal anchor-based approach was used to derive the MCID using the Health Assessment Questionnaire, patient global assessment, and pain as anchors. Minimal important change in activity, fatigue, and sleep were determined by estimating mean changes in these outcomes in patients showing change in a narrow range about the MCID of the internal anchor. Correlation analysis was used to determine the consistency of the changes in the outcomes and anchors, and a Delphi process was used to determine the final MCID values.
RESULTS: For the 2 trials, consistent patterns of change for activity, fatigue, and sleep and the internal anchors were found with correlations in the range of 0.5, 0.7, and 0.4, respectively. The mean changes for activity, fatigue, and sleep in a narrow range about the MCID of the 3 internal anchors corresponding to the 2 trials were: 3.4 to 4.3 for activity; 6.7 to 17.0 for fatigue; and 4.1 to 7.3 for sleep. Following the Delphi process the MCID determined were 4 for activity, 10 for fatigue, and 6 for sleep.
CONCLUSION: These MCID for activity limitation, fatigue, and sleep problems can be used in designing clinical trials and providing benchmarks in assessing patient improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17304654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  44 in total

Review 1.  Biologic interventions for fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Celia Almeida; Ernest H S Choy; Sarah Hewlett; John R Kirwan; Fiona Cramp; Trudie Chalder; Jon Pollock; Robin Christensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-06-06

2.  Examination of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Association with TNF-Inhibitor Treatment Response: Results from a US Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Cynthia J Larmore; Natalie N Boytsov; Carol L Gaich; Xiang Zhang; Andre B Araujo; Sabrina Rebello; Bob A Salim; George W Reed; Leslie R Harrold
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2018-01-10

3.  Validation of pain and patient global scales in chronic gout: data from two randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Shuo Yang; Vibeke Strand; Lee Simon; Anna Forsythe; Steve Hamburger; Lang Chen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Minimally important differences of the gout impact scale in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Andrew J Sarkin; Puja P Khanna; Marian M Shieh; Arthur F Kavanaugh; Robert A Terkeltaub; Susan J Lee; Jasvinder A Singh; Jan D Hirsch
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  Responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences after cholecystectomy: GIQLI versus SF-36.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; Hao-Hsien Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu; Herng-Chia Chiu; Yih-Huei Uen; King-Teh Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Minimally important differences in the Mahler's Transition Dyspnoea Index in a large randomized controlled trial--results from the Scleroderma Lung Study.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Chi-Hong Tseng; Daniel E Furst; Philip J Clements; Robert Elashoff; Michael Roth; David Elashoff; Donald P Tashkin
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 7.580

7.  Sensitivity to change of the modified Rodnan skin score in diffuse systemic sclerosis--assessment of individual body sites in two large randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Marian Kaldas; Puja P Khanna; Daniel E Furst; Philip J Clements; Weng Kee Wong; James R Seibold; Arnold E Postlethwaite; Dinesh Khanna
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 7.580

8.  Abatacept: a T-cell co-stimulation modulator for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Andrew J K Ostör
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Physical function improvements and relief from fatigue and pain are associated with increased productivity at work and at home in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with certolizumab pegol.

Authors:  Johanna M Hazes; Peter Taylor; Vibeke Strand; Oana Purcaru; Geoffroy Coteur; Philip Mease
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 7.580

10.  Clinical efficacy and safety of abatacept in methotrexate-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and poor prognostic factors.

Authors:  R Westhovens; M Robles; A C Ximenes; S Nayiager; J Wollenhaupt; P Durez; J Gomez-Reino; W Grassi; B Haraoui; W Shergy; S-H Park; H Genant; C Peterfy; J-C Becker; A Covucci; R Helfrick; J Bathon
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.