Literature DB >> 17304412

Best duplex-sonographic criteria for the assessment of renal artery stenosis--correlation with intra- arterial pressure gradient.

D Staub1, R Canevascini, R W Huegli, M Aschwanden, C Thalhammer, S Imfeld, E Singer, A L Jacob, K A Jaeger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Colour coded duplex sonography (DS) is widely used for the assessment of renal artery stenosis (RAS). Different criteria have been specified for the detection of significant RAS. The aim of our study was to compare routinely used DS criteria, both with intra-arterial pressure gradients and arteriographic degree of stenosis, and to validate different cut-off points of these DS criteria for the assessment of haemodynamically significant RAS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed forty-nine patients (median age 67 years, 29 male) with RAS documented by duplex sonography, referred for renal arterial subtraction arteriography and intra-arterial pressure measurement (93 renal arteries). DS measurement of peak systolic velocity (PSV) in the main renal artery, the renal/aortal velocity ratio (RAR) and the side-to-side differences of the intrarenal resistive indices (DeltaRI) were correlated to intra-arterial pressure measurements and arteriographic degree of stenosis. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were used to determine the best cut-off value of DS criteria.
RESULTS: 39 (41 %) renal arteries had normal findings or non significant stenosis < 50 %, 23 (25 %) had a diameter reduction between 50 % and 69 %, and 31 (33 %) > or = 70 %. The systolic pressure gradient showed good correlation with the arteriographic degree of RAS (r = 0.77, p < 0.001) and the PSV measured by duplex sonography (r = 0.67, p < 0.001). Mean systolic pressure gradient was 24 mmHg at 50 % stenosis and 23 mmHg at PSV of 200 cm/sec. A PSV of > or = 200 cm/sec provided a sensitivity of 92 % and specificity of 81 % for detecting RAS of > or = 50 %. Similar results were found for RAR > or = 2.5 with a sensitivity of 92 % and specificity of 79 %. These cut-off values have a negative predictive value of 100 % for excluding high-grade RAS of > or = 70 %. A DeltaRI of > or =0.05 has low sensitivity of 31 %, but a high specificity of 97 % for detecting RAS of > or = 50 %.
CONCLUSION: DS measurements and the severity of arteriographic diameter reduction correlate well with systolic pressure gradients. Clinically expedient DS criteria for detecting RAS of > or = 50 % are a PSV of > or = 200 cm/sec or a RAR of > or =2.5. These criteria allow reliable exclusion of severe RAS of > or = 70 %.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17304412     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-962881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultraschall Med        ISSN: 0172-4614            Impact factor:   6.548


  10 in total

1.  [Ultrasound diagnostics of renal blood vessels and transplant kidney].

Authors:  K F Stock
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Doppler ultrasound and renal artery stenosis: An overview.

Authors:  A Granata; F Fiorini; S Andrulli; F Logias; M Gallieni; G Romano; E Sicurezza; C E Fiore
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2009-10-12

3.  Color Doppler sonography in the study of chronic ischemic nephropathy.

Authors:  M Meola; I Petrucci
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2008-05-09

4.  Multimarker assessment for the prediction of renal function improvement after percutaneous revascularization for renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Daniel Staub; Sasan Partovi; Thomas Zeller; Tobias Breidthardt; Max Kaech; Jasper Boeddinghaus; Christian Puelacher; Thomas Nestelberger; Markus Aschwanden; Christian Mueller
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-06

5.  Difference in left ventricular mass index between hypertensive patients with and without renal artery stenosis by propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Shiro Hoshida; Yukinori Shinoda; Hirooki Inui; Ryoji Hosoi; Fumiko Teranishi; Nobuaki Asaoka; Toshifumi Sugitani; Toshimitsu Hamasaki
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Analysis of peripheral artery velocity tracing in a porcine model.

Authors:  Qingxin Meng; Weiwei Ding; Bin Yang; Ninghua Fu; Guangming Lu
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Difference between renal and splenic resistive index as a novel criterion in Doppler evaluation of renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Clemens Grupp; Michael J Koziolek; Manuel Wallbach; Kerstin Hoxhold; Gerhard A Müller; Carsten Bramlage
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Renal Doppler Resistive Index as a Marker of Oxygen Supply and Demand Mismatch in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Francesco Corradi; Claudia Brusasco; Francesco Paparo; Tullio Manca; Gregorio Santori; Filippo Benassi; Alberto Molardi; Alan Gallingani; Andrea Ramelli; Tiziano Gherli; Antonella Vezzani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound versus Doppler Ultrasound in Grading Renal Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Yanhua Cui; Quanbin Zhang; Jiping Yan; Ji Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Ultrasound diagnostics of renal artery stenosis: Stenosis criteria, CEUS and recurrent in-stent stenosis.

Authors:  W Schäberle; L Leyerer; W Schierling; K Pfister
Journal:  Gefasschirurgie       Date:  2015-08-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.