Literature DB >> 17302844

Genetic estimates of annual reproductive success in male brown bears: the effects of body size, age, internal relatedness and population density.

Andreas Zedrosser1, Eva Bellemain, Pierre Taberlet, Jon E Swenson.   

Abstract

1. We studied male yearly reproductive success (YRS) and its determinants (phenotypic characteristics, age, population density) in two Scandinavian brown bear populations, using molecular techniques to determine paternity. 2. We found a significant difference in male YRS between the study areas, with lower YRS in the south than in the north. 3. In general, older and larger males had higher YRS. Older males may be more experienced in competition for reproduction (male dominance). Large body size is of direct benefit in male-male competition and of advantage in endurance competition for the access to females. 4. Age was relatively more important for YRS in the north and body size was more important in the south, due perhaps to differences in male age structure due to illegal killing. A single old male dominated the reproduction in the north during the study, which resulted most probably in the relatively higher importance of age in the north. In the south, with a more even male age structure, no single male was able to dominate, probably resulting in a more intense competition among males, with body size as the deciding factor. 5. Male YRS was correlated positively with population density. This may be related to the structure of the expanding bear population, with female densities declining towards the population edge. 6. Internal relatedness, a measure of genetic heterozygosity, was correlated negatively with YRS, suggesting that outbred individuals have a higher YRS. Individual heterozygosity at key or many loci may reflect male physical qualities and condition-sensitive traits, which may benefit males directly in contest or in sperm competition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17302844     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01203.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  21 in total

1.  Non-random distribution of individual genetic diversity along an environmental gradient.

Authors:  Mélody Porlier; Marc Bélisle; Dany Garant
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Biochemical Foundations of Health and Energy Conservation in Hibernating Free-ranging Subadult Brown Bear Ursus arctos.

Authors:  Karen Gjesing Welinder; Rasmus Hansen; Michael Toft Overgaard; Malene Brohus; Mads Sønderkær; Martin von Bergen; Ulrike Rolle-Kampczyk; Wolfgang Otto; Tomas L Lindahl; Karin Arinell; Alina L Evans; Jon E Swenson; Inge G Revsbech; Ole Frøbert
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  The effects of primiparity on reproductive performance in the brown bear.

Authors:  Andreas Zedrosser; Bjørn Dahle; Ole-Gunnar Støen; Jon E Swenson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Influence of prey body characteristics and performance on predator selection.

Authors:  Thomas H Holmes; Mark I McCormick
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Landscape condition influences energetics, reproduction, and stress biomarkers in grizzly bears.

Authors:  Abbey E Wilson; Dan Wismer; Gordon Stenhouse; Nicholas C Coops; David M Janz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Faster reproductive rates trade off against offspring growth in wild chimpanzees.

Authors:  Melissa Emery Thompson; Martin N Muller; Kris Sabbi; Zarin P Machanda; Emily Otali; Richard W Wrangham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Environmental, biological and anthropogenic effects on grizzly bear body size: temporal and spatial considerations.

Authors:  Scott E Nielsen; Marc R L Cattet; John Boulanger; Jerome Cranston; Greg J McDermid; Aaron B A Shafer; Gordon B Stenhouse
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.964

8.  Stress and reproductive hormones in grizzly bears reflect nutritional benefits and social consequences of a salmon foraging niche.

Authors:  Heather M Bryan; Chris T Darimont; Paul C Paquet; Katherine E Wynne-Edwards; Judit E G Smits
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Endocrine disruptors alter social behaviors and indirectly influence social hierarchies via changes in body weight.

Authors:  Benjamin Kim; Eliezer Colon; Shivansh Chawla; Laura N Vandenberg; Alexander Suvorov
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Stress and reproductive hormones reflect inter-specific social and nutritional conditions mediated by resource availability in a bear-salmon system.

Authors:  Heather M Bryan; Chris T Darimont; Paul C Paquet; Katherine E Wynne-Edwards; Judit E G Smits
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.