Literature DB >> 17302768

Assessment of education and computerized decision support interventions for improving transfusion practice.

Jeffrey M Rothschild1, Siobhan McGurk, Melissa Honour, Linh Lu, Aubre A McClendon, Priya Srivastava, W Hallowell Churchill, Richard M Kaufman, Jerry Avorn, E Francis Cook, David W Bates.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Overuse of blood products is common, but prior efforts to improve transfusion decisions have met with limited success. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study examines transfusion practices before and after a conventional educational intervention followed by a randomized controlled trial of a decision support (DS) intervention with computerized physician order entry (CPOE) for red blood cell, platelet, and fresh-frozen plasma orders. The study was conducted in an academic medical center between April 2003 and June 2004. Orders originating from units not using CPOE with DS (e.g., the emergency department) were excluded. Junior housestaff were randomly assigned into a control group and an intervention group who received DS for transfusion orders. Transfusion orders were initially classified according to guideline rules as DS-agree or DS-disagree. Chart reviews assessed inappropriateness for all DS-disagree orders and a sample of DS-agree orders. The total of inappropriate transfusion orders included chart review confirmed DS-disagree orders and DS-agree orders reclassified as inappropriate.
RESULTS: The percentages of inappropriate nonemergent transfusion orders during the baseline phase for the entire staff and randomly assigned junior housestaff were 72.6 percent (2154/2967) and 71.9 percent (1259/1752) and improved after conventional education to 63.8 percent (1699/2663; p < 0.0001) and 63.3 percent (1263/1996; p < 0.0001), respectively. The percentage of inappropriate orders in the DS intervention group continued to improve (59.6%, 804/1350; p < 0.0001). Physicians accepted 14 percent (133/939) of new DS-recommended orders, especially recommendations to increase transfusion doses (73%).
CONCLUSIONS: Education and computerized DS both decreased the percentage of inappropriate transfusions, although the residual amount of inappropriate transfusions remained high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17302768     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01093.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  20 in total

Review 1.  Changing clinical practice through patient specific reminders available at the time of the clinical encounter: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tim A Holt; Margaret Thorogood; Frances Griffiths
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Tuscan study on the appropriateness of fresh-frozen plasma transfusion (TuSAPlaT).

Authors:  Giancarlo Maria Liumbruno; Maria Laura Sodini; Giuliano Grazzini
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Computerized physician order entry: promise, perils, and experience.

Authors:  Raman Khanna; Tony Yen
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2014-01

4.  Evaluation of RBC Transfusion Practice in Adult ICUs and the Effect of Restrictive Transfusion Protocols on Routine Care.

Authors:  Kevin P Seitz; Jonathan E Sevransky; Greg S Martin; John D Roback; David J Murphy
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Formative Usability Testing Reduces Severe Blood Product Ordering Errors.

Authors:  Evan W Orenstein; Jeanne Boudreaux; Margo Rollins; Jennifer Jones; Christy Bryant; Dean Karavite; Naveen Muthu; Jessica Hike; Herb Williams; Tania Kilgore; Alexis B Carter; Cassandra D Josephson
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 6.  Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behaviour: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Alison Jennings; Alain Mayhew; Craig Ramsay; Martin Eccles; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems.

Authors:  Adam Wright; Dean F Sittig; Joan S Ash; Joshua Feblowitz; Seth Meltzer; Carmit McMullen; Ken Guappone; Jim Carpenter; Joshua Richardson; Linas Simonaitis; R Scott Evans; W Paul Nichol; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  Effectiveness of computerized decision support systems linked to electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lorenzo Moja; Koren H Kwag; Theodore Lytras; Lorenzo Bertizzolo; Linn Brandt; Valentina Pecoraro; Giulio Rigon; Alberto Vaona; Francesca Ruggiero; Massimo Mangia; Alfonso Iorio; Ilkka Kunnamo; Stefanos Bonovas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  A Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease Platelet Ordering Errors and a Proposed Model for Evaluating Clinical Decision Support Effectiveness.

Authors:  Julia Whitlow Yarahuan; Amy Billet; Jonathan D Hron
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.342

10.  Reducing PSA-Based Prostate Cancer Screening in Men Aged 75 Years and Older with the Use of Highly Specific Computerized Clinical Decision Support.

Authors:  Jeremy B Shelton; Lee Ochotorena; Carol Bennett; Paul Shekelle; Lorna Kwan; Ted Skolarus; Caroline Goldzweig
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.