Literature DB >> 17302569

Clinical efficacy of alternative antiandrogen therapy in Japanese men with relapsed prostate cancer after first-line hormonal therapy.

Koji Okihara1, Osamu Ukimura, Noriyuki Kanemitsu, Yoichi Mizutani, Akihiro Kawauchi, Tsuneharu Miki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To confirm the effectiveness of alternative antiandrogen therapy (AAT) in Japanese patients with prostate cancer relapse after first-line hormonal therapy.
METHODS: A total of 80 patients who had successive serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression after first-line hormonal therapy (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist alone: 21 cases; combined antiandrogen blockade therapy: 59 cases) were enrolled. We evaluated the positive ratio of antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome (AWS), the PSA responses with second- and third-line AAT, and cause-specific survival in terms of the effectiveness of AAT.
RESULTS: The overall positive AWS ratio after first-line therapy was 33%, while that after second-line therapy was 7%. There was no correlation between the first-line PSA response and the positive AWS. Of the 10 positive and the 20 negative AWS cases, secondary antiandrogen administration was effective in 50% and 60% of cases, respectively. The positive PSA responders at second- and third-line therapy were 51% and 13%, respectively. For second-line therapy, the effective rates from steroidal to non-steroidal, from non-steroidal to non-steroidal antiandrogen, and from non-steroidal to steroidal were 83%, 43%, and 14%, respectively. The cause-specific survival of the second-line responders was significantly better than that of the non-responders.
CONCLUSION: There was a substantial number of patients who found second-line AAT to be modestly effective. Flutamide was effective as an alternative antiandrogen for the patients' relapse treatment with bicalutamide in Japanese men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17302569     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01698.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  10 in total

1.  Predictors of poor response to first-generation anti-androgens as criteria for alternate treatments for patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kenichiro Fukuoka; Jun Teishima; Hirotaka Nagamatsu; Shogo Inoue; Tetsutaro Hayashi; Koji Mita; Masanobu Shigeta; Kanao Kobayashi; Mitsuru Kajiwara; Yuichi Kadonishi; Takatoshi Tacho; Akio Matsubara
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Enzalutamide versus flutamide for castration-resistant prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade therapy with bicalutamide: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Taro Iguchi; Satoshi Tamada; Minoru Kato; Sayaka Yasuda; Taiyo Otoshi; Kosuke Hamada; Takeshi Yamasaki; Tatsuya Nakatani
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Switching and withdrawing hormonal agents for castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  David Lorente; Joaquin Mateo; Zafeiris Zafeiriou; Alan D Smith; Shahneen Sandhu; Roberta Ferraldeschi; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Clinical outcomes of anti-androgen withdrawal and subsequent alternative anti-androgen therapy for advanced prostate cancer following failure of initial maximum androgen blockade.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Momozono; Hideaki Miyake; Hiromoto Tei; Ken-Ichi Harada; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-10

5.  Identification of favorable subgroups for alternative anti-androgen therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kotaro Suzuki; Tomoaki Terakawa; Katsumi Shigemura; Junya Furukawa; Kenichi Harada; Nobuyuki Hinata; Yuzo Nakano; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-27

6.  Efficacy of Immediate Switching from Bicalutamide to Flutamide as Second-Line Combined Androgen Blockade.

Authors:  Yumiko Yokomizo; Takashi Kawahara; Yasuhide Miyoshi; Masako Otani; Shoji Yamanaka; Jun-Ichi Teranishi; Kazumi Noguchi; Masahiro Yao; Hiroji Uemura
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Enzalutamide versus flutamide for castration-resistant prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade therapy with bicalutamide: study protocol for a multicenter randomized phase II trial (the OCUU-CRPC study).

Authors:  Taro Iguchi; Satoshi Tamada; Minoru Kato; Sayaka Yasuda; Takeshi Yamasaki; Tatsuya Nakatani
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Enzalutamide + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) versus flutamide + ADT in Japanese men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: AFTERCAB study.

Authors:  Hiroji Uemura; Kazuki Kobayashi; Akira Yokomizo; Shiro Hinotsu; Shigeo Horie; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Seiji Naito; Norio Nonomura; Osamu Ogawa; Mototsugu Oya; Kazuhiro Suzuki; Atsushi Saito; Satoshi Uno; Hideyuki Akaza
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2021-08-20

9.  Corepressive function of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 in androgen receptor of prostate cancer cells treated with antiandrogen.

Authors:  Keisuke Takeda; Noboru Hara; Tsutomu Nishiyama; Masayuki Tasaki; Fumio Ishizaki; Yoshihiko Tomita
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Prior switching to a second-line nonsteroidal antiandrogen does not impact the therapeutic efficacy of abiraterone acetate in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a real-world retrospective study.

Authors:  Jin-Ge Zhao; Jian-Dong Liu; Peng-Fei Shen; Xin Tang; Guang-Xi Sun; Xing-Ming Zhang; Jun-Ru Chen; Kun-Peng Shu; Ming Shi; Hao Zeng
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.