Literature DB >> 17301790

The Earth's 'hum' is driven by ocean waves over the continental shelves.

Spahr C Webb1.   

Abstract

Observations show that the seismic normal modes of the Earth at frequencies near 10 mHz are excited at a nearly constant level in the absence of large earthquakes. This background level of excitation has been called the 'hum' of the Earth, and is equivalent to the maximum excitation from a magnitude 5.75 earthquake. Its origin is debated, with most studies attributing the forcing to atmospheric turbulence, analogous to the forcing of solar oscillations by solar turbulence. Some reports also predicted that turbulence might excite the planetary modes of Mars to detectable levels. Recent observations on Earth, however, suggest that the predominant excitation source lies under the oceans. Here I show that turbulence is a very weak source, and instead it is interacting ocean waves over the shallow continental shelves that drive the hum of the Earth. Ocean waves couple into seismic waves through the quadratic nonlinearity of the surface boundary condition, which couples pairs of slowly propagating ocean waves of similar frequency to a high phase velocity component at approximately double the frequency. This is the process by which ocean waves generate the well known 'microseism peak' that dominates the seismic spectrum near 140 mHz (refs 11, 12), but at hum frequencies, the mechanism differs significantly in frequency and depth dependence. A calculation of the coupling between ocean waves and seismic modes reproduces the seismic spectrum observed. Measurements of the temporal correlation between ocean wave data and seismic data have confirmed that ocean waves, rather than atmospheric turbulence, are driving the modes of the Earth.

Year:  2007        PMID: 17301790     DOI: 10.1038/nature05536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  4 in total

1.  Evidence for infragravity wave-tide resonance in deep oceans.

Authors:  Hiroko Sugioka; Yoshio Fukao; Toshihiko Kanazawa
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Potential Pitfalls in the Analysis and Structural Interpretation of Seismic Data from the Mars InSight Mission.

Authors:  D Kim; P Davis; V Lekić; R Maguire; N Compaire; M Schimmel; E Stutzmann; J C E Irving; P Lognonné; J-R Scholz; J Clinton; G Zenhäusern; N Dahmen; S Deng; A Levander; M P Panning; R F Garcia; D Giardini; K Hurst; B Knapmeyer-Endrun; F Nimmo; W T Pike; L Pou; N Schmerr; S C Stähler; B Tauzin; R Widmer-Schnidrig; W B Banerdt
Journal:  Bull Seismol Soc Am       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 2.910

Review 3.  Natural and Anthropogenic Sources of Seismic, Hydroacoustic, and Infrasonic Waves: Waveforms and Spectral Characteristics (and Their Applicability for Sensor Calibration).

Authors:  Michaela Schwardt; Christoph Pilger; Peter Gaebler; Patrick Hupe; Lars Ceranna
Journal:  Surv Geophys       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 7.965

4.  Supersensitive Detector of Hydrosphere Pressure Variations.

Authors:  Grigory Dolgikh; Sergey Budrin; Stanislav Dolgikh; Aleksandr Plotnikov
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.