Literature DB >> 17301509

A health economic evaluation of aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Japan.

Kiichiro Tsutani1, Ataru Igarashi, Keita Fujikawa, Thomas Evers, Maria Kubin, Mark Lamotte, Lieven Annemans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Low-dose aspirin is standard care in patients with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). But, the use of low-dose aspirin in primary prevention has not yet been fully established in Japan although meta-analyses and US/European guidelines support its use in persons at increased CVD risk. This study assessed the health economic consequences of the use of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of CVD in Japan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Based on results reported in two recent meta-analyses of Hayden (2002) and Eidelman (2003), a Markov model was constructed to predict the cost-effectiveness of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of CVD. The model consists of 5 health states: 1) no history of CVD, 2) history of stroke, 3) history of myocardial infarction, 4) history of CVD, and 5) death, with a 10-year time horizon and 1-year cycles. Direct costs from the insurers' perspective were used, while health outcome was expressed in Life-Years Gained (LYG). 'Discounting Rate' with 3% was applied on effectiveness and costs.
RESULTS: For patients with a 1-year risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) of 1.5% (10-year risk of +/-15%), the model demonstrated 'dominance' of the 'aspirin' arm versus 'no aspirin' arm; the 10-year costs were Japanese Yen (JPY) 634,000 (Euro 4,857) and JPY 518,000 (Euro 3,968) in the 'no aspirin' arm and 'aspirin' arm, respectively, while LYG was 8.33 and 8.36, respectively. Low-dose aspirin treatment saved on average JPY 116,000 (Euro 889) [95% confidence interval (CI) JPY 57,077-175,151] per patient. Dominance was demonstrated (non-significant) in the first year of treatment and, low-dose aspirin was dominant to 'no aspirin' arm from an annual risk of 0.20%. Other results of sensitivity analysis on gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding rate, stroke rate, cost of each event and discounting showed the robustness of the results.
CONCLUSIONS: Administering low-dose aspirin to patients with a 1-year risk of CHD of 1.5% and more is significantly cost-saving from the insurers' perspective in Japan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17301509     DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.46.1843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Med        ISSN: 0918-2918            Impact factor:   1.271


  7 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of chronic kidney disease mass screening test in Japan.

Authors:  Masahide Kondo; Kunihiro Yamagata; Shu-ling Hoshi; Chie Saito; Koichi Asahi; Toshiki Moriyama; Kazuhiko Tsuruya; Hideaki Yoshida; Kunitoshi Iseki; Tsuyoshi Watanabe
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.801

2.  Cost-effectiveness of obstructive sleep apnea screening for patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Reiko Okubo; Masahide Kondo; Shu-ling Hoshi; Kunihiro Yamagata
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Practical implications of nanodosimetry in medicine.

Authors:  Jahangir A Satti
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Health Economic Analysis of Antiplatelet Therapy for Acute Coronary Syndromes in the Context of Five Eastern Asian Countries.

Authors:  Bin Wu; Ruoyan Gai Tobe; Yuchen Liu; Ben He
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Using 5 consecutive years of NICE guidance to describe the characteristics and influencing factors on the economic evaluation of orphan oncology drugs.

Authors:  Duan Shengnan; Lv Zixuan; Zhou Na; Zhu Weikai; Yi Yuanyuan; Liu Jiasu; Yuan Ni
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-14

6.  Antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents and chronic subdural hematoma in the elderly.

Authors:  Pasquale De Bonis; Gianluca Trevisi; Chiara de Waure; Antonella Sferrazza; Massimo Volpe; Angelo Pompucci; Carmelo Anile; Annunziato Mangiola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cost-effectiveness evaluation of aspirin in primary prevention of myocardial infarction amongst males with average cardiovascular risk in Iran.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Amirsadri; Mohammad Javad Sedighi
Journal:  Res Pharm Sci       Date:  2017-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.