BACKGROUND: At the time of transition from hospital to home, many patients are challenged by multi-drug regimens. The authors' standard patient education tool is a personalised Medication Discharge Worksheet (MDW) that includes a list of medications and administration times. Nonetheless, patient understanding, satisfaction, and safety remain suboptimal. Therefore, the authors designed a new tool: Durable Display at Discharge (3D). Unlike MDW, 3D features (1) space in which a tablet or pill is to be affixed and displayed, (2) trade name (if apt), (3) unit strength, (4) number (and/or fraction) of units to be taken, (5) purpose (indication), (6) comment/caution, (7) larger font, (8) card stock durability and (9) a reconciliation feature. METHODS: The authors conducted an exploratory, randomised trial (n = 138) to determine whether 3D, relative to MDW, improves patient satisfaction, improves patient understanding and reduces self-reported medication errors. Trained survey research personnel, blinded to hypotheses, interviewed patients by telephone 7-14 days after discharge. RESULTS: Both tools were similarly associated with high satisfaction and few self-reported errors. However, 3D subjects demonstrated greater understanding of their medications. CONCLUSIONS: Although both tools are associated with similarly high levels of patient satisfaction and low rates of self-reported medication error, 3D appears to promote patient understanding of the medications, and warrants further study.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: At the time of transition from hospital to home, many patients are challenged by multi-drug regimens. The authors' standard patient education tool is a personalised Medication Discharge Worksheet (MDW) that includes a list of medications and administration times. Nonetheless, patient understanding, satisfaction, and safety remain suboptimal. Therefore, the authors designed a new tool: Durable Display at Discharge (3D). Unlike MDW, 3D features (1) space in which a tablet or pill is to be affixed and displayed, (2) trade name (if apt), (3) unit strength, (4) number (and/or fraction) of units to be taken, (5) purpose (indication), (6) comment/caution, (7) larger font, (8) card stock durability and (9) a reconciliation feature. METHODS: The authors conducted an exploratory, randomised trial (n = 138) to determine whether 3D, relative to MDW, improves patient satisfaction, improves patient understanding and reduces self-reported medication errors. Trained survey research personnel, blinded to hypotheses, interviewed patients by telephone 7-14 days after discharge. RESULTS: Both tools were similarly associated with high satisfaction and few self-reported errors. However, 3D subjects demonstrated greater understanding of their medications. CONCLUSIONS: Although both tools are associated with similarly high levels of patient satisfaction and low rates of self-reported medication error, 3D appears to promote patient understanding of the medications, and warrants further study.
Authors: Frederick A Masoudi; Charles A Baillie; Yongfei Wang; W David Bradford; John F Steiner; Edward P Havranek; JoAnne Micale Foody; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2005-10-10
Authors: Catherine Demers; John J V McMurray; Karl Swedberg; Marc A Pfeffer; Christopher B Granger; Bertil Olofsson; Robert S McKelvie; Jan Ostergren; Eric L Michelson; Peter A Johansson; Duolao Wang; Salim Yusuf Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-10-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Julia Freigofas; Hanna Marita Seidling; Renate Quinzler; Ben Schöttker; Kai-Uwe Saum; Hermann Brenner; Walter Emil Haefeli Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Felix Nickel; Jonathan D Hendrie; Thomas Bruckner; Karl F Kowalewski; Hannes G Kenngott; Beat P Müller-Stich; Lars Fischer Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Christoph Becker; Samuel Zumbrunn; Katharina Beck; Alessia Vincent; Nina Loretz; Jonas Müller; Simon A Amacher; Rainer Schaefert; Sabina Hunziker Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-08-02
Authors: Fatma Karapinar-Çarkıt; Sander D Borgsteede; Marjo J A Janssen; Marlies Mak; Nimet Yildirim; Carl E H Siegert; Peter G M Mol; Toine C G Egberts; Patricia M L A van den Bemt Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Beat P Müller-Stich; Nicole Löb; Diana Wald; Thomas Bruckner; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Martina Kadmon; Markus W Büchler; Lars Fischer Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 2.463