Literature DB >> 17300679

Early CA-125 fluctuations in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer receiving chemotherapy.

P Sabbatini1, D Mooney, A Iasonos, H Thaler, C Aghajanian, M Hensley, J Konner, D Spriggs, N R Abu-Rustum, J Dupont.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze retrospective populations with recurrent ovarian cancer to assess differences in CA-125 patterns during chemotherapy. The populations included all patients treated between January 1994 and January 2004, who received liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan, and all patients treated between July 1997 and June 2001, who received carboplatin. Prognostic variables were abstracted from the medical records. Eighty-nine patients received liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan therapy and 21 received carboplatin; of these, 59 (liposomal doxorubicin), 60 (topotecan), and 17 (carboplatin) patients had evaluable CA-125 patterns. Patients given liposomal doxorubicin were more likely to have received only one or two cycles of therapy (37/89 [42%]) than patients receiving either carboplatin (5/21 [24%]) or topotecan (20/89[22%]). In cycle 1, CA-125 increases in patients were carboplatin, 4/17 (24%); liposomal doxorubicin, 41/59 (69%); and topotecan, 11/60 (18%). In cycle 2, CA-125 increases were carboplatin, 2/16 (13%); liposomal doxorubicin, 19/37 (51%); and topotecan, 9/50 (18%). In cycle 3, CA-125 increases were carboplatin, 0/12 (0%); liposomal doxorubicin, 7/23 (30%); and topotecan, 6/38 (16%). Of patients having any CA-125 decrease and given two or more cycles, fewer declines were seen in those given liposomal doxorubicin precycle 2 (18/35[51%]) than in those given carboplatin (13/16[81%]) or topotecan (49/56[88%]). The most prominent delay in CA-125 decline was in patients given liposomal doxorubicin compared with those given topotecan or carboplatin. In the entire population, only 3 of 107 (2.8%) patients demonstrated first CA-125 decline precycle 4. Discontinuation of therapy solely on the basis of early CA-125 increase (precycle 3), particularly with liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy, may exclude some patients who will benefit from continued therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17300679     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00823.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  4 in total

1.  Utility of serum CA-125 monitoring in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  Julia L Boland; Qin Zhou; Alexia E Iasonos; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Jason Konner; Margaret Callahan; Claire Friedman; Carol Aghajanian; Paul Sabbatini; Dmitriy Zamarin; Karen A Cadoo
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Ovarian cancer biomarkers: current options and future promise.

Authors:  Christine M Coticchia; Jiang Yang; Marsha A Moses
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 3.  CA125-related tumor cell kinetics variables after chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  G Colloca; A Venturino; I Governato
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Robert Strother; Daniela Matei
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.423

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.