Literature DB >> 17300541

Decision aid software programs in telenursing: not used as intended? Experiences of Swedish telenurses.

Inger Holmström1.   

Abstract

Telenurses at call centers use decision aid software programs to offer triage recommendations and self-care advice to the general public. Decision aid programs are intended to support medical safety but were suggested by telenurses to be a hindrance to the dialogue. The aim of this study was to explore the use of decision aid software programs for telenursing, from the perspective of the users. A qualitative, descriptive approach was used. Twelve telenurses in Sweden were interviewed twice. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically. Four themes were found: support for assessment but not for the decision; inconsistency between actual practice and the decision aid software; limited support for learning and information; and communication challenges and software programs. The software programs were a support for assessment, rather than decision-making, assuring the nurses that the relevant questions were asked. They were not fully adapted to current clinical practice, focusing mainly on acute conditions. Nurses worked to a large extent with self-care advice, often over-riding the recommendations made.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17300541     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2007.00299.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Health Sci        ISSN: 1441-0745            Impact factor:   1.857


  19 in total

Review 1.  Evolution and challenges in the design of computational systems for triage assistance.

Authors:  María M Abad-Grau; Jorge Ierache; Claudio Cervino; Paola Sebastiani
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  The missing element of telemedicine for diabetes: decision support software.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Mark W True
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-09-01

3.  Diabetes telehealth and computerized decision support systems: a sound system with a human touch is needed.

Authors:  Inger Holmström
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01

4.  Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions?

Authors:  Wendy Lipworth; Natalie Taylor; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Implementing telephone triage in general practice: a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jamie Murdoch; Anna Varley; Emily Fletcher; Nicky Britten; Linnie Price; Raff Calitri; Colin Green; Valerie Lattimer; Suzanne H Richards; David A Richards; Chris Salisbury; Rod S Taylor; John L Campbell
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Telephone counselling by nurses in Norwegian primary care out-of-hours services: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Vivian Midtbø; Guttorm Raknes; Steinar Hunskaar
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone triage of patients requesting same day consultations in general practice: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial comparing nurse-led and GP-led management systems (ESTEEM).

Authors:  John L Campbell; Nicky Britten; Colin Green; Tim A Holt; Valerie Lattimer; Suzanne H Richards; David A Richards; Chris Salisbury; Rod S Taylor; Emily Fletcher
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Question design in nurse-led and GP-led telephone triage for same-day appointment requests: a comparative investigation.

Authors:  Jamie Murdoch; Rebecca Barnes; Jillian Pooler; Val Lattimer; Emily Fletcher; John L Campbell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  A comparison of calls subjected to a malpractice claim versus 'normal calls' within the Swedish healthcare direct: a case-control study.

Authors:  Annica Ernesäter; Maria Engström; Ulrika Winblad; Inger K Holmström
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Factors Determining the Success and Failure of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Conceição Granja; Wouter Janssen; Monika Alise Johansen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.