T L Finch1, F S Mair, C R May. 1. Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 21 Claremont Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. tracy.finch@ncl.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Teledermatology has the potential to revolutionize the delivery of dermatology services by facilitating access to specialist services at a distance. In the U.K. over the previous decade there have been numerous attempts at introducing and using teledermatology; however, the development of teledermatology as routine service provision remains limited. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors that promote successful use of teledermatology as a part of routine service provision. METHODS: A longitudinal qualitative study of teledermatology, drawing on data from in-depth semistructured interviews; observations of systems in practice; and public meetings. Data were analysed collectively by the research team using established qualitative analytical techniques to identify key thematic categories. The sample consisted of teledermatology services within the U.K. (n = 12) studied over 8 years (1997-2005). Individual participants (n = 68 interviews) were consultant dermatologists, researchers, teledermatology nurses, administrators, patient advocates, general practitioners and technologists. RESULTS: The analysis compared services that did or did not become part of routine healthcare practice to identify features that supported the normalization of teledermatology. Requirements for using and integrating teledermatology into practice included: political support; perceived benefit and relative commitment that outweighs effort; pragmatic approaches to proving efficacy and safety; perception of risk as being 'manageable' on the basis of professional judgement; high levels of flexibility in practice (in terms of individuals, technology and organization); and reconceptualizing professional roles. CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation of teledermatology as a routine service requires greater understanding of and attention to the interplay between social and technical aspects of teledermatology, and how this is accommodated both by healthcare professionals and the organizations in which they work.
BACKGROUND: Teledermatology has the potential to revolutionize the delivery of dermatology services by facilitating access to specialist services at a distance. In the U.K. over the previous decade there have been numerous attempts at introducing and using teledermatology; however, the development of teledermatology as routine service provision remains limited. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors that promote successful use of teledermatology as a part of routine service provision. METHODS: A longitudinal qualitative study of teledermatology, drawing on data from in-depth semistructured interviews; observations of systems in practice; and public meetings. Data were analysed collectively by the research team using established qualitative analytical techniques to identify key thematic categories. The sample consisted of teledermatology services within the U.K. (n = 12) studied over 8 years (1997-2005). Individual participants (n = 68 interviews) were consultant dermatologists, researchers, teledermatology nurses, administrators, patient advocates, general practitioners and technologists. RESULTS: The analysis compared services that did or did not become part of routine healthcare practice to identify features that supported the normalization of teledermatology. Requirements for using and integrating teledermatology into practice included: political support; perceived benefit and relative commitment that outweighs effort; pragmatic approaches to proving efficacy and safety; perception of risk as being 'manageable' on the basis of professional judgement; high levels of flexibility in practice (in terms of individuals, technology and organization); and reconceptualizing professional roles. CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation of teledermatology as a routine service requires greater understanding of and attention to the interplay between social and technical aspects of teledermatology, and how this is accommodated both by healthcare professionals and the organizations in which they work.
Authors: Rosa Taberner Ferrer; Antonio Pareja Bezares; Alex Llambrich Mañes; Antonia Vila Mas; Ignacio Torné Gutiérrez; Cristina Nadal Lladó; Guillermo Mas Estaràs Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2009-06-05 Impact factor: 1.137
Authors: Tracy L Finch; Frances S Mair; Catherine O'Donnell; Elizabeth Murray; Carl R May Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Catherine Pope; Susan Halford; Joanne Turnbull; Jane Prichard; Melania Calestani; Carl May Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-03-23 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Jane Hendy; Theopisti Chrysanthaki; James Barlow; Martin Knapp; Anne Rogers; Caroline Sanders; Peter Bower; Robert Bowen; Ray Fitzpatrick; Martin Bardsley; Stanton Newman Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 2.655