Literature DB >> 17299393

Small cell oesophageal carcinoma: an institutional experience and review of the literature.

E Hudson1, J Powell, S Mukherjee, T D L Crosby, A E Brewster, T S Maughan, H Bailey, J F Lester.   

Abstract

Primary small cell oesophageal carcinoma (SCOC) is rare, prognosis is poor and there is no established optimum treatment strategy. It shares many clinicopathologic features with small cell carcinoma of the lung; therefore, a similar staging and treatment strategy was adopted. Sixteen cases referred to Velindre hospital between 1998 and 2005 were identified. Patients received platinum-based combination chemotherapy if appropriate. Those with limited disease (LD) received radical radiotherapy (RT) to all sites of disease on completion of chemotherapy. Median survival of all patients was 13.2 months. Median survival of patients with LD was significantly longer than those with extensive disease (24.4 vs 9.1 months, P=0.034). This is one of the largest single institution series in the world literature. Combined modality therapy using platinum-based combination chemotherapy and radical RT may allow a nonsurgical approach to management, avoiding the morbidity of oesophagectomy. Prophylactic cranial irradiation is controversial, and should be discussed on an individual basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17299393      PMCID: PMC2360086          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Primary small cell oesophageal carcinoma (SCOC) was first described in 1952 by McKeown (1952), who reported two cases at post mortem examination . It is a rare condition, accounting for between 0.5 and 2.4% of all primary oesophageal malignancies (Casas ). Prognosis is poor and metastases are often present at the time of diagnosis; patients presenting with disease outside the oesophagus have a median survival of only 1 month without treatment (Casas ). Owing to its rarity, an optimum treatment strategy has not been established, and various combinations of surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy have been described in the literature. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a far more common disease, accounting for up to 20% of all primary lung cancers and it shares many clinicopathologic features with SCOC. There is good evidence that combination chemotherapy significantly increases median survival compared to no systemic therapy or single agent chemotherapy in SCLC (Girling, 1996; Agra ). In addition, in SCLC patients with limited disease (LD) and a complete response to chemotherapy, consolidation thoracic irradiation and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) both increase 3-year absolute survival by 5.4% (Pignon ; Auperin ). Therefore, a similar staging and treatment strategy for SCOC was adopted. We report our clinical experience using this strategy and review the published literature on SCOC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All cases of SCOC referred to Velindre Cancer Centre, Southeast Wales, between 1998 and 2005, were identified using an electronic database holding information on all treated cancer patients (Information System for Clinical Organisations, ISCO). Data were collected retrospectively from ISCO and by case note review on demographic details, performance status (PS), treatment, and response to treatment. All patients were required to have a histological diagnosis of small cell carcinoma according to WHO criteria (WHO, 1982). Survival was recorded from the date of histological diagnosis. Staging was analogous to that used in SCLC as proposed by the Veterans’ Administration Lung Group; LD was defined as a tumour mass contained within the oesophagus or perioesophageal tissues, with or without regional lymph node involvement, such that the disease can be encompassed within a tolerable radiation therapy port, and extensive disease (ED) included all other patients (Zelen, 1973). For the literature review, the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cancerlit were searched using the key words oesophagus, oesophagus, small cell, neuroendocrine, and gastrointestinal. Hand searching of journals, relevant books, and review articles was also carried out. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were identified, and their clinical details are summarised in Table 1. The age range of all patients was 48–81 years with a median age of 68.5 years and 12/16 (75%) patients were female. Histological diagnosis was established by oesophagogastroduodenoscopy and biopsy in all patients. In all cases, pure SCOC was reported with no other histological subtypes identified. In 8/16 (50%) patients selected, immunohistochemical staining was performed to confirm the diagnosis. Neurone-specific enolase was positive in three patients and CD56 in three patients, supporting the diagnosis of small cell carcinoma. In two patients immunohistochemistry was unhelpful, but a second opinion on the cellular morphology supported the diagnosis of small cell carcinoma. In 8/16 (50%) patients the diagnosis was made on the classical histological appearance of small cell carcinoma and immunohistochemistry was not deemed necessary. In total, 13/16 (81%) patients were staged with a CT scan of the chest and abdomen. Two patients had abdominal ultrasound (Patients 9 and 14) and one patient was deemed too frail for staging investigations (Patient 16). Only one patient (Patient 11) had a bone scan as part of the initial staging investigations. A CT scan of the head was not performed in any patient.
Table 1

Clinical and treatment details of the 16 SCC oesophagus patients

Patient Age Sex PS Stage Primary Site Site of metastases Chemo (cycles) Response Oesophageal RT PCI Relapse site Survival (months)
177F0LDLower 4 PEPR40 Gy/15F  104, alive
271M1LDLower   44 Gy/12F Local, nodal19
359M0LDLower 6 ICEPR40 Gy/15F30 Gy/10F 48, alive
448F0LDLower 6 CEPR50 Gy/25F30 Gy/10FAscites24
551F0LDMid 4 PEPR45 Gy/25F Local9, alive
650F0LDMid 4 PEPR50 Gy/25F30 Gy/10FBone14
753FUKEDLowerAbdo nodes4 PEPR30 Gy/15F Local12
867F2EDLowerLiver, spleen4 PEUK  UK6
972F4EDLowerliver     0.5
1073F2EDLowerLiver     1
1171M1EDLowerLiver4 PEPR  PD10
1272F1EDMidLiver, lungs, SCF6 PEPR  PD30, alive
             
1371F1EDLowerLiver4 PEPR25 Gy/10F Local, liver, brain13
1465F2EDLowerLiver    PD2
1558M1EDLowerAbdo nodes, pancreas4 PEPR40 Gy/15F  7, alive
1681F2UKLowerUK  8 Gy/1F UK7

Abdo=abdominal; CE=cisplatin and etoposide; DF=disease-free; ED=extensive disease; F=female; ICE=ifosphamide, cisplatin and etoposide; LD=limited disease; M=male; PE=carboplatin and etoposide; PCI=prophylactic cranial irradiation; PS=performance status; PR=partial response; RT=radiotherapy; SCF=supraclavicular fossa; UK, unknown

Performance status was recorded in 15/16 (93%) patients. In total, 10/16 patients had a PS of 0–1, 4/16 had a PS of 2 and 1/16 had a PS of 4. In total, 13/16 patients had disease in the lower-third of the oesophagus and 3/16 had disease in the middle-third. No tumours were identified in the upper-third of the oesophagus. In total, 6/16 (38%) patients had LD, and 9/16 (56%) had ED. Stage was not recorded in 1/16 (6%) patient. Of those with ED, 7/9 (78%) patients had liver metastases at the time of diagnosis. In total, 6/9 (67%) patients with ED were given chemotherapy; all received four to six cycles of PE (carboplatin AUC 5–6 intravenously (i.v.) in combination with oral etoposide 3-weekly). Patients 13 and 15 received palliative RT to the oesophagus following a partial response (PR) to chemotherapy. Three patients (patients 9, 10, and 14) received no chemotherapy because of poor PS, and were managed with best supportive care. Patient 16 (unknown stage) was treated with palliative RT only. Five of the six patients with LD were given chemotherapy. Patient 3 received six cycles of ICE (carboplatin AUC 6 i.v. ifosfamide 3 gm−2 i.v. and oral etoposide 4-weekly). The other patients received four to six cycles of either PE or CE (cisplatin 60–80 mgm−2 i.v. and oral etoposide 3-weekly). All five patients received RT to the oesophagus given with curative intent following a PR to chemotherapy. Patients 3 and 4 also received PCI. One patient with LD (Patient 2) was treated at another cancer centre with radical RT alone. His subsequent treatment was carried out at Velindre hospital. Radiotherapy to the oesophagus was given 3–4 weeks after the last cycle of chemotherapy. The dose given was 30–50 Gy in 12–25 fractions over 2–5 weeks using megavoltage photons. Treatment was 2D or 3D-planned to cover all areas of disease including any involved lymph nodes. When used, PCI was given concurrently with RT to the oesophagus. The median survival of all 16 patients was 13.2 months (95% CI 7.7–18.7), and is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Overall survival of all patients with SCC oesophagus.

To date, 7/9 (78%) patients with ED have died. Patients 12 and 15 are alive 30 and 7 months after diagnosis, respectively. The median survival of all patients with ED is 9.1 months (95%CI 3.3–14.8). Of the six patients with LD, patients 1 and 3 are alive with no evidence of recurrent disease, 104 and 48 months after diagnosis respectively. Patient 5 is alive 9 months after diagnosis but has relapsed locally. Patient 2 relapsed locally and died 19 months after diagnosis. Patient 4 developed malignant ascites and patient 6 bone metastases, dying 24 and 14 months after diagnosis, respectively. The median survival of all patients with LD was 24.4 months (95% CI 19.9–28.9), which was significantly longer than those with ED (P=0.034; Figure 2).
Figure 2

Overall survival of patients with limited vs ED.

DISCUSSION

Primary SCOC is a relatively rare condition, and we have reported one of the largest single-institution series in world literature. The largest retrospective analysis has been carried out by Casas , who analysed data on 199 evaluable patients found in the literature. They reported a male / female ratio of 1.57 : 1, with 95% of tumours situated in the mid- and lower oesophagus. One-third of cases were mixed tumours with squamous differentiation also identified in addition to small sell carcinoma. Our series has a male /  female ratio of 1 : 4, which is at variance with all other published literature on SCOC. The relatively small sample size may in part explain the difference, but a recent increase in the proportion of female smokers may also play a role. We identified no tumours in the upper-third of the oesophagus, concurring with Casas . All tumours were pure small cell carcinoma with no mixed tumours reported. However, none of our patients had surgery, and the absence of other histological subtypes may simply reflect the small size of the tissue samples examined at the time of diagnosis. More than half of patients in our series had metastatic disease at diagnosis, as in most other published series (Casas ). This is similar to SCLC, indicating SCOC is an aggressive, systemic disease. The rarity of SCOC and absence of randomised trials means the optimum treatment strategy remains unclear. For the treatment of LD with curative intent, RT alone has been used; however, results generally have been disappointing and long-term survivors are only rarely reported (Doherty ; Huncharek ; Medgysey ). The only patient in our series treated with radical RT alone died 19 months after diagnosis. There are few reports of surgery being used as the sole treatment modality and, as with RT, most institutional series report a poor outcome with surgery alone. Hosokawa reported on five LD patients treated with radical oesophagectomy alone, and only one patient survived more than 24 months. Craig reported on five patients treated with surgery alone, and only one survived more than 12 months. Law treated three patients with radical oesophagectomy with a median survival of 11.6 months. The role of chemotherapy in SCLC is well established (Agra et al, 2005; Girling, 1996). Evidence suggests that extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma is also a chemosensitive disease (Lester ; Levenson ).There is a general consensus in the recent literature that systemic chemotherapy should also be used in the treatment of SCOC. Casas reported a median survival of 20 months in those patients receiving systemic chemotherapy compared to only 5 months in those having local treatment only. Performance status was poorly reported in the series included in the Casas review; good PS is a better prognostic factor in SCLC (Bremnes ), and it is reasonable to assume it is so in SCC. Poor PS patients tend not be given chemotherapy, and the longer survival in the chemotherapy group may therefore be owing in part to the better PS of these patients. As a result of relatively poor outcomes using local treatment only and the apparent chemosensitivity of SCOC, combined modality treatment strategies were developed. The MD Anderson Cancer Center reported on four LD patients treated with chemotherapy followed by RT and/or oesophagectomy. One patient remains alive and disease–free, 57 months after diagnosis (Medgysey ). Craig reported a patient surviving 96 months after oesophagectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. In our series, of the six patients with LD, two are alive with no evidence of recurrent disease 47 and 79 months after diagnosis, respectively. Both received chemotherapy followed by RT to all sites of disease. Patients with LD were offered PCI at the discretion of the treating oncologist. PCI in SCLC patients with LD has been shown to decrease the incidence of brain metastases from 59 to 33%, and increase 3-year absolute survival by 5.4%. The incidence of brain metastases in SCOC is not known, and to our knowledge, no study has been reported on the use of PCI in SCOC. To date, none of the patients with LD has relapsed in the brain and only two patients had PCI.

CONCLUSION

Caution should be applied in basing treatment strategies on retrospective data, as poor record keeping and bias may influence results. However, for localised disease it does seem that combined modality therapy using platinum-based combination chemotherapy and RT to the oesophagus may provide effective local control and avoid the morbidity of extensive surgery. Oesophagectomy or RT alone are probably inadequate, and if used, should be combined with adjuvant or neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. The role of PCI is controversial, and should be discussed with patients on an individual basis. For those patients presenting with metastases, palliative chemotherapy may prolong survival, and RT can be used for local control in selected good PS patients.
  17 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of thoracic radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J P Pignon; R Arriagada; D C Ihde; D H Johnson; M C Perry; R L Souhami; O Brodin; R A Joss; M S Kies; B Lebeau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-12-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience and literature review.

Authors:  C D Medgyesy; R A Wolff; J B Putnam; J A Ajani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Keynote address on biostatistics and data retrieval.

Authors:  M Zelen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep 3       Date:  1973-03

4.  Bladder preservation in small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: an institutional experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  J F Lester; E Hudson; J B Barber
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.126

5.  Oat cell carcinoma of esophagus: a report of six British patients with a review of the literature.

Authors:  M A Doherty; M McIntyre; S J Arnott
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  S Y Law; M Fok; K Y Lam; S L Loke; L T Ma; J Wong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  The World Health Organization histological typing of lung tumours. Second edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus. The Massachusetts General Hospital experience, 1978 to 1993.

Authors:  M Huncharek; J Muscat
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 9.  Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Y Agra; M Pelayo; M Sacristan; A Sacristán; C Serra; X Bonfill
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

10.  Small cell carcinoma presenting as an extrapulmonary neoplasm: sites of origin and response to chemotherapy.

Authors:  R M Levenson; D C Ihde; M J Matthews; M H Cohen; A F Gazdar; P A Bunn; J D Minna
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Carboplatin and etoposide combined with radiotherapy for limited-stage small-cell esophageal carcinoma: three cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Yuko Isoyama; Yoshiyuki Shioyama; Satoshi Nomoto; Saiji Ohga; Takeshi Nonoshita; Kayoko Onishi; Shuji Matsuura; Kazushige Atsumi; Koutaro Terashima; Hideki Hirata; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  A complete response in small cell carcinoma of the esophagus treated by s-1/cisplatin combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Masatsugu Hiraki; Masayuki Tanaka; Seiji Sato; Keita Kai; Kiyoto Morito; Kiichiro Kobayashi; Hirokazu Noshiro; Osamu Tokunaga; Kohji Miyazaki
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2010-12

3.  Primary Esophagogastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: a Retrospective Study from the Nottingham Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Center.

Authors:  Constantinos Savva; Philip Kaye; Irshad Soomro; Simon L Parsons; Eleanor James; Srinivasan Madhusudan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2018-03

4.  Non-surgical approach to small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: does this rare disease have the same tumor behavior as SCLC?

Authors:  Yuki Nakajima; Sadamoto Zenda; Keiko Minashi; Tomonori Yano; Makoto Tahara; Toshihiko Doi; Masakatsu Onozawa; Keiji Nihei; Satoshi Fujii; Atsushi Ohtsu
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  A retrospective study of definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Chikatoshi Katada; Shouko Komori; Tsutomu Yoshida; Shogo Kawakami; Akinori Watanabe; Kenji Ishido; Mizutomo Azuma; Takuya Wada; Kei Hosoda; Keishi Yamashita; Naoki Hiki; Satoshi Tanabe; Hiromichi Ishiyama; Wasaburo Koizumi
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.230

6.  Platinum-doublet chemotherapy for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Akihiro Ohmoto; Yu Fujiwara; Nobuyuki Horita; Kenji Nakano; Shunji Takahashi
Journal:  Discov Oncol       Date:  2022-05-30

7.  The epidemiology and survival of extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma in South East England, 1970-2004.

Authors:  Yien Ning S Wong; Ruth H Jack; Vivian Mak; Møller Henrik; Elizabeth A Davies
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  The Role of Surgery in Treating Resectable Limited Disease of Esophageal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

Authors:  Han-Yu Deng; Gang Li; Jun Luo; Xin-Rui Li; Guha Alai; Yi-Dan Lin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Distinct mutational backgrounds and clonal architectures implicated prognostic discrepancies in small-cell carcinomas of the esophagus and lung.

Authors:  Zhengbo Song; Yueping Liu; Guoping Cheng; Lianpeng Chang; Zicheng Yu; Ming Chen; Gang Chen
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 8.469

Review 10.  Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Gastroenteropancreatic System: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Emma Elizabeth Ilett; Seppo W Langer; Ingrid Holst Olsen; Birgitte Federspiel; Andreas Kjær; Ulrich Knigge
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.