Literature DB >> 1729860

Predictive factors of effectiveness of streptokinase in deep venous thrombosis.

C Théry1, J J Bauchart, M Lesenne, P Asseman, J G Flajollet, R Legghe, P Marache.   

Abstract

In a prospective study, 174 patients (118 women and 56 men, average age 44 years, range 14 to 82) with proximal extensive thrombosis received streptokinase (100,000 U/hour) for an average of 2.8 days (range 0.5 to 7) through the catheter of a temporary caval filter. Twenty-seven of 45 (60%) patients with nonocclusive clots were completely free of clots at the second phlebography versus 17 of 116 (14%) with occlusive clots (p less than 0.001). Among nonocclusive clots, proximal ones (caval, iliac and femoral) were more easily lysed than popliteal clots (88 of 116 [76%] vs 26 of 58 [45%]; p less than 0.001). In 41 of 132 (31%) patients, a daily injection of contrast medium through the filter-carrying catheter enabled the observation of a clot in the filter, which was lysed by streptokinase. Seventy patients with follow-up greater than 2 years (median 34 months) were examined clinically. Nineteen of 22 (86%) patients with venograms free of clots at discharge were free of clinical sequelae versus 16 of 48 (33%) without normal venograms (p less than 0.001). It is concluded that: (1) in the case of occlusive clots, only a few patients were normalized after streptokinase; (2) proximal nonocclusive clots were most effectively lysed; (3) when venograms were free of clots at discharge, the majority of patients did not have venous sequelae at follow-up; and (4) embolic migration seems to occur frequently with streptokinase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1729860     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90686-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  In vitro evaluation of a new temporary venous filter: the Spring filter.

Authors:  Z Y Xian; S Roy; J Hosaka; K Kuroki; K Kvernebo; I Enge; F Laerum
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Are too many inferior vena cava filters used? Controversial evidences in different clinical settings: a narrative review.

Authors:  Michele Dalla Vestra; Elisabetta Grolla; Luca Bonanni; Raffaele Pesavento
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Treatment of an ilio-caval thrombosis by mechanical thrombolysis.

Authors:  A Moughabghab; C Socolovsky; R M Lemaitre; A Tyasi; C Alauze; J M Lefebvre; P Cuingnet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Inferior vena cava filter insertion through the popliteal vein: enabling the percutaneous endovenous intervention of deep vein thrombosis with a single venous access approach in a single session.

Authors:  Hyoung Ook Kim; Jae Kyu Kim; Jin Gyoon Park; Nam Yeol Yim; Yang Jun Kang; Hye Doo Jung
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Endovascular treatment of venous occlusive disease.

Authors:  Tilo Kölbel; Anders Gottsäter; Tobias Kühme; Mats Lindh; Krasnodar Ivancev
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2008-10-24

6.  Prophylactic Implantation of Inferior Vena Cava Filter during Endovascular Therapies for Deep Venous Thrombosis of the Lower Extremities.

Authors:  Takuji Yamagami; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2011-02-17

Review 7.  [Fibrinolytic therapy of deep vein thrombosis].

Authors:  B Weidmann; W Jansen; B Franzen; M Tauchert
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-03-15

8.  Popliteal Access in the Supine Position for Endovenous Management of Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Authors:  Cuneyt Koksoy; Omer Arda Cetinkaya
Journal:  EJVES Short Rep       Date:  2019-06-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.