Literature DB >> 17297375

Bone-mounted miniature robotic guidance for pedicle screw and translaminar facet screw placement: part 2--Evaluation of system accuracy.

Daisuke Togawa1, Mark M Kayanja, Mary K Reinhardt, Moshe Shoham, Alin Balter, Alon Friedlander, Nachshon Knoller, Edward C Benzel, Isador H Lieberman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of a novel bone-mounted miniature robotic system for percutaneous placement of pedicle and translaminar facet screws.
METHODS: Thirty-five spinal levels in 10 cadavers were instrumented. Each cadaver's entire torso was scanned before the procedure. Surgeons planned optimal entry points and trajectories for screws on reconstructed three-dimensional virtual x-rays of each vertebra. Either a clamp or a minimally invasive external frame was attached to the bony anatomy. Anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopic images using targeting devices were obtained and automatically registered with the virtual x-rays of each vertebra generated from the computed tomographic scan obtained before the procedure. A miniature robot was mounted onto the clamp and external frame and the system controlled the robot's motions to align the cannulated drill guide along the planned trajectory. A drill bit was introduced through the cannulated guide and a hole was drilled through the cortex. Then, K-wires were introduced and advanced through the same cannulated guide and left inside the cadaver. The cadavers were scanned with computed tomography after the procedure and the system's accuracy was evaluated in three planes, comparing K-wire positions with the preoperative plan. A total of fifty-five procedures were evaluated.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 32 K-wires and all four screws were placed with less than 1.5 mm of deviation; average deviation was 0.87 +/- 0.63 mm (range, 0-1.7 mm) from the preoperative plan in this group. Sixteen of 19 K-wires were placed with less than 1.5 mm of deviation. There was one broken and one bent K-wire. Another K-wire was misplaced because of collision with the previously placed wire on the contralateral side of the same vertebra because of a mistake in planning, resulting in a 6.5-mm deviation. When this case was excluded, average deviation was 0.82 +/- 0.65 mm (range, 0-1.5 mm).
CONCLUSION: These results verify the system's accuracy and support its use for minimally invasive spine surgery in selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17297375     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000249257.16912.AA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  22 in total

Review 1.  Robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hani J Marcus; Thomas P Cundy; Dipankar Nandi; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Submuscular approach to the lumbar spine and extraforaminal cage implantation].

Authors:  F Magerl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  A 6-DOF parallel bone-grinding robot for cervical disc replacement surgery.

Authors:  Heqiang Tian; Chenchen Wang; Xiaoqing Dang; Lining Sun
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Robotic-guided sacro-pelvic fixation using S2 alar-iliac screws: feasibility and accuracy.

Authors:  Xiaobang Hu; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparison of the accuracy between robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hao Liu; Weikai Chen; Zongyi Wang; Jun Lin; Bin Meng; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 6.  Percutaneous screw placement in the lumbar spine with a modified guidance technique based on 3D CT navigation system.

Authors:  Ioannis D Siasios; John Pollina; Asham Khan; Vassilios George Dimopoulos
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

Review 7.  Robotics in trauma and orthopaedics.

Authors:  Karthik Karuppiah; Joydeep Sinha
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement: lessons learned from the first 102 patients.

Authors:  Xiaobang Hu; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  What is the learning curve for robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement in spine surgery?

Authors:  Xiaobang Hu; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Placement of pedicle screws in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis of screw placement relative to structures at risk.

Authors:  Ahmet Yilmaz Sarlak; Levent Buluç; Hasan Tahsin Sarisoy; Kaya Memişoğlu; Bilgehan Tosun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.